Recombination-restarted replication makes inverted chromosome fusions at inverted repeats
Open Access
- 25 November 2012
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Nature
- Vol. 493 (7431) , 246-249
Abstract
A new mechanism of chromosomal rearrangement is identified through the observation that broken or collapsed DNA replication forks restarted by homologous recombination have a high propensity for U-turns at short inverted repeats; the error-prone nature of this mechanism is suggested to contribute to gross chromosomal rearrangements and copy-number variations present in cancer and other genomic disorders. Stress that causes broken or collapsed DNA replication forks can induce copy-number variations (CNVs) and gross chromosomal rearrangements (GCRs), both of which are commonly found in cancer cells. Antony Carr and colleagues find that a collapsed fork that has been restarted by homologous recombination is more error prone than a fork that initiates at origins of replication. These restarted forks frequently perform U-turns at short inverted repeats, a possible cause of CNVs and GCRs. The authors suggest that the error-prone nature of restarted forks could be a source of cancer-causing gene abnormalities and spontaneous genetic disorders in the absence of a double-strand break. Impediments to DNA replication are known to induce gross chromosomal rearrangements (GCRs) and copy-number variations (CNVs). GCRs and CNVs underlie human genomic disorders1 and are a feature of cancer2. During cancer development, environmental factors and oncogene-driven proliferation promote replication stress. Resulting GCRs and CNVs are proposed to contribute to cancer development and therapy resistance3. When stress arrests replication, the replisome remains associated with the fork DNA (stalled fork) and is protected by the inter-S-phase checkpoint. Stalled forks efficiently resume when the stress is relieved. However, if the polymerases dissociate from the fork (fork collapse) or the fork structure breaks (broken fork), replication restart can proceed either by homologous recombination or microhomology-primed re-initiation4,5. Here we ascertain the consequences of replication with a fork restarted by homologous recombination in fission yeast. We identify a new mechanism of chromosomal rearrangement through the observation that recombination-restarted forks have a considerably high propensity to execute a U-turn at small inverted repeats (up to 1 in 40 replication events). We propose that the error-prone nature of restarted forks contributes to the generation of GCRs and gene amplification in cancer, and to non-recurrent CNVs in genomic disorders.Keywords
This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- Failure of Origin Activation in Response to Fork Stalling Leads to Chromosomal Instability at Fragile SitesMolecular Cell, 2011
- Break-Induced Replication Is Highly InaccuratePLOS Biology, 2011
- Cell-type-specific replication initiation programs set fragility of the FRA3B fragile siteNature, 2011
- The FRA2C common fragile site maps to the borders of MYCN amplicons in neuroblastoma and is associated with gross chromosomal rearrangements in different cancersHuman Molecular Genetics, 2011
- Massive Genomic Rearrangement Acquired in a Single Catastrophic Event during Cancer DevelopmentCell, 2011
- Breakages at common fragile sites set boundaries of amplified regions in two leukemia cell lines K562 – Molecular characterization of FRA2H and localization of a new CFS FRA2SCancer Letters, 2010
- Pathways of mammalian replication fork restartNature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, 2010
- swi1 - and swi3 -dependent and independent replication fork arrest at the ribosomal DNA of Schizosaccharomyces pombeProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2004
- Transcription Termination Factor reb1p Causes Two Replication Fork Barriers at Its Cognate Sites in Fission Yeast Ribosomal DNA In VivoMolecular and Cellular Biology, 2004
- Effects of palindrome size and sequence on genetic stability in the bacteriophage φX174 genomeJournal of Molecular Biology, 1987