Differential Clinical Responses to Everolimus-Eluting and Paclitaxel-Eluting Coronary Stents in Patients With and Without Diabetes Mellitus
Authors:
- 23 August 2011
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Circulation
- Vol. 124 (8) , 893-900
Abstract
Background—: Some (but not all) prior trials have reported differential outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention with paclitaxel-eluting stents versus stents eluting rapamycin analogs according to the presence of diabetes mellitus. These studies lacked sufficient power to examine individual safety and efficacy end points. Methods and Results—: To determine whether an interaction exists between the presence of diabetes mellitus and treatment with everolimus-eluting stents compared with paclitaxel-eluting stents, we pooled the databases from the Clinical Evaluation of the Xience V Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System in the Treatment of Patients With De Novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions (SPIRIT) II, SPIRIT III, SPIRIT IV, and A Trial of Everolimus-Eluting Stents and Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents for Coronary Revascularization in Daily Practice (COMPARE) trials in which percutaneous coronary intervention was performed in 6780 patients, 1869 (27.6%) of whom had diabetes mellitus. Patients without diabetes mellitus treated with everolimus-eluting stents compared with paclitaxel-eluting stents had significantly reduced 2-year rates of mortality (1.9% versus 3.1%; P =0.01), myocardial infarction (2.5% versus 5.8%; P P P P =0.01), stent thrombosis ( P =0.0006), and target lesion revascularization ( P =0.02). Conclusions—: We have identified a substantial interaction between diabetes mellitus and stent type on clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention. In patients without diabetes mellitus, everolimus-eluting stents compared with paclitaxel-eluting stents resulted in substantial 2-year reductions in death, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, and target lesion revascularization, whereas no significant differences in safety or efficacy outcomes were present in diabetic patients. Clinical Trial Registration—: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifiers: NCT00180310 (SPIRIT II), NCT00180479 (SPIRIT III), NCT00307047 (SPIRIT IV), and NCT01016041 (COMPARE).Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Two-Year Clinical, Angiographic, and Intravascular Ultrasound Follow-Up of the XIENCE V Everolimus-Eluting Stent in the Treatment of Patients With De Novo Native Coronary Artery LesionsCirculation: Cardiovascular Interventions, 2009
- Safety and Efficacy of Drug-Eluting and Bare Metal StentsCirculation, 2009
- Comparison of an Everolimus-Eluting Stent and a Paclitaxel-Eluting Stent in Patients With Coronary Artery DiseaseJAMA, 2008
- Randomized, Double-Blind, Multicenter Study of the Endeavor Zotarolimus-Eluting Phosphorylcholine-Encapsulated Stent for Treatment of Native Coronary Artery LesionsCirculation, 2006
- Sirolimus- vs Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents in De Novo Coronary Artery LesionsJAMA, 2006
- Paclitaxel-Eluting or Sirolimus-Eluting Stents to Prevent Restenosis in Diabetic PatientsNew England Journal of Medicine, 2005
- Outcomes with the polymer-based paclitaxel-eluting TAXUS stent in patients with diabetes mellitusJACC, 2005
- Clinical and Angiographic Predictors of Restenosis After Percutaneous Coronary InterventionCirculation, 2004
- Impact of Sirolimus-Eluting Stents on Outcome in Diabetic PatientsCirculation, 2004
- Diabetes mellitus and the clinical and angiographic outcome after coronary stent placementJACC, 1998