Marginal gaps and internal voids after root-end filling using three calcium silicate-based materials: A Micro-CT analysis
Authors:
- Alexander Pompermayer JardineAJAlexander Pompermayer Jardine
- Ketsia Fernanda Váz RosaKRKetsia Fernanda Váz Rosa
- Felipe Barros MatosoFMFelipe Barros Matoso
- Ramiro Martins QuintanaRQRamiro Martins Quintana
- Renata Grazziotin-SoaresRenata Grazziotin-Soares
- Patricia Maria Poli KopperPatricia Maria Poli Kopper
Open Access
- 1 August 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by FapUNIFESP (SciELO) in Brazilian Dental Journal
- Vol. 32 (4) , 1-7
Abstract
This study evaluated the 3D quality of root-end filling, assessing the presence (volume and percentage) of marginal gaps and internal voids formed after retro-filling with three calcium silicate-based materials: MTA Angelus (Angelus Soluçoes Odontologicas, Londrina, PR, Brazil), Biodentine (Septodont Ltd., Saint Maur-des-Faussés, France) and Neo MTA Plus (Avalon Biomed Inc., Bradenton, Florida, US). Thirty human, extracted, single rooted teeth were used. Orthograde root canal treatment, root resection (3mm shorter than the apex) and retrograde cavity preparation with ultrasonic tips were performed. Teeth were divided into 3 groups (n =10 each) following a stratified randomization according to the initial volume of the root-end cavity. After retrofilling, samples were stored for 7 days. Then, two rounds of micro-CT scans were performed: soon after root-end preparation (with the cavity still empty) and 7 days after root-end filling. Marginal gaps, internal voids volume (mm3 and %), as well as, the overall defects (sum of gaps and voids) were evaluated. Statistics compared the three groups in relation to those defects. There was not statistical difference between groups regarding the marginal gaps (P≥ 0.05), the internal voids (P≥ 0.05), and the overall defects (P≥ 0.05). Median (mm3) and % of overall air-entrapment defects (gaps and/or voids) was: 0.004mm3 and 1.749% for MTA Angelus, 0.018mm3 and 6.660% for Biodentine, and 0.012mm3 and 4.079% for Neo MTA Plus. All materials had gaps and/or voids. No differences were found between MTA Angelus, Biodentine and Neo MTA Plus.Keywords
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- Staining Potential of Neo MTA Plus, MTA Plus, and Biodentine Used for Pulpotomy ProceduresJournal of Endodontics, 2015
- Sealing ability, marginal adaptation and their correlation using three root-end filling materials as apical plugsJournal of Applied Oral Science, 2010
- Effect of smear layer and root-end cavity thickness on apical sealing ability of MTA as a root-end filling material: A bacterial leakage studyOral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology and Endodontology, 2010
- Sealing ability of MTA and amalgam in different root-end preparations and resection bevel angles: an in vitro evaluation using marginal dye leakageBrazilian Dental Journal, 2010
- Characterization of Small-Colony Variants ofEnterococcus faecalisIsolated from Chickens with Amyloid ArthropathyJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 2008
- Evaluation of the effect of tracer pH on the sealing ability of glass ionomer cement and mineral trioxide aggregateJournal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine, 2008
- Ex vivo microscopic assessment of factors affecting the quality of apical seal created by root-end fillingsInternational Endodontic Journal, 2007
- Comparison of the Sealing of Resilon, Pro Root MTA, and Super-EBA as Root-End Filling Materials: A Bacterial Leakage StudyJournal of Endodontics, 2006
- The prognosis and expected outcome of apical surgeryEndodontic Topics, 2005
- A comparison of MTA, Super‐EBA, composite and amalgam as root‐end filling materials using a bacterial microleakage modelInternational Endodontic Journal, 1999