Hounsfield units value is a better predictor of pedicle screw loosening than the T-score of DXA in patients with lumbar degenerative diseases
Authors:
Top Cited Papers
- 24 March 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in European Spine Journal
- Vol. 29 (5) , 1105-1111
Abstract
Purpose To compare the performance of using Hounsfield units (HU) value derived from computed tomography and T-score of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) to predict pedicle screw loosening. Methods We reviewed 253 patients aged ≥ 50 years undergoing pedicle screw fixation for lumbar degenerative diseases (LDD). The evaluation of screw loosening: radiolucent zones of ≥ 1 mm thick in X-ray. The criterion for osteoporosis: the lowest T-score ≤ − 2.5. The average HU value of L1–L4 was used to represent lumbar bone mineral density (BMD). The area under receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) was used to evaluate the performance of predicting screw loosening. Results One patient underwent reoperation for screw loosening at 9 months follow-up. At 12 months follow-up, the loosening rate was 30.6% (77/252) in the remaining 252 patients. Osteoporotic patients had higher loosening rate than non-osteoporotic patients (39.3% vs. 25.8%, P = 0.026). The T-score showed no significant difference between loosening group and non-loosening group (− 2.1 ± 1.5 vs. − 1.7 ± 1.6, P = 0.074), and so is the lowest lumbar BMD of DXA (0.83 ± 0.16 g/cm2 vs. 0.88 ± 0.19 g/cm2, P = 0.054). The HU value was lower in the loosening group (106.8 ± 34.4 vs. 129.8 ± 45.7, P < 0.001). The HU value (OR, 0.980; 95%CI 0.968–0.993; P = 0.002) was the independent influencing factor of screw loosening. The AUC of predicting screw loosening was 0.666 (P < 0.001) for HU value and 0.574 (P = 0.062) for T-score. Conclusions HU value is a better predictor of pedicle screw loosening than T-score of DXA in patients aged ≥ 50 years with LDD. We should not only focus on the DXA measurements when making surgical plans concerning lumbar fixation. Graphic abstract These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.Keywords
Funding Information
- Clinical Cohort Construction Program of Peking University Third Hospital (BYSYDL2019006)
This publication has 31 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparison between two pedicle screw augmentation instrumentations in adult degenerative scoliosis with osteoporosisBMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 2011
- Instrumented lumbar arthrodesis in elderly patients: prospective study using cannulated cemented pedicle screw instrumentationEuropean Spine Journal, 2011
- Radiographic Evaluation of Monocortical Versus Tricortical Purchase Approaches in Lumbosacral Fixation With Sacral Pedicle ScrewsSpine, 2010
- Mid-range outcomes in 64 consecutive cases of multilevel fusion for degenerative diseases of the lumbar spineOrthopedic Reviews, 2010
- Clinical Course and Significance of the Clear Zone Around the Pedicle Screws in the Lumbar Degenerative DiseaseSpine, 2008
- Risk Factors Associated with the Halo Phenomenon after Lumbar Fusion Surgery and its Clinical SignificanceAsian Spine Journal, 2008
- Safety and Efficacy of Implant Removal for Patients With Recurrent Back Pain After a Failed Degenerative Lumbar Spine SurgeryJournal of Spinal Disorders & Techniques, 2007
- Pedicle screw fixation in spinal disorders: A European viewEuropean Spine Journal, 1997
- Assessment of Pseudarthrosis in Pedicle Screw FusionJournal of Spinal Disorders, 1996
- Stability of Transpedicle Screwing for the Osteoporotic SpineSpine, 1993