Attention and attribute overlap in preferential choice
Author:
Open Access
- 1 July 2017
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
- Vol. 70 (7) , 1174-1196
Abstract
Attributes that are common, or overlapping, across alternatives in two-alternative forced preferential choice tasks are often non-diagnostic. In many settings, attending to and evaluating these attributes does not help the decision maker determine which of the available alternatives is the most desirable. For this reason, many existing behavioural theories propose that decision makers ignore common attributes while deliberating. Across six experiments, we find that decision makers do direct their attention selectively and ignore attributes that are not present in or associated with either of the available alternatives. However, they are as likely to attend to common attributes as they are to attend to attributes that are unique to a single alternative. These results suggest the need for novel theories of attention in preferential choice.Keywords
Funding Information
- Economic and Social Research Council (ES/K002201/1)
This publication has 56 references indexed in Scilit:
- Losses as modulators of attention: Review and analysis of the unique effects of losses over gains.Psychological Bulletin, 2013
- A Model of Focusing in Economic Choice*The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2012
- Mindful Judgment and Decision MakingAnnual Review of Psychology, 2009
- Decision by samplingCognitive Psychology, 2006
- Multialternative decision field theory: A dynamic connectionst model of decision making.Psychological Review, 2001
- Tests of Theories of Decision Making: Violations of Branch Independence and Distribution IndependenceOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1997
- The limits of anchoringJournal of Behavioral Decision Making, 1994
- Choosing versus rejecting: Why some options are both better and worse than othersMemory & Cognition, 1993
- Contingent weighting in judgment and choice.Psychological Review, 1988
- Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and BiasesScience, 1974