Increasing response rates from physicians in oncology research: a structured literature review and data from a recent physician survey
Open Access
- 28 February 2012
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Springer Nature in British Journal of Cancer
- Vol. 106 (6) , 1021-1026
Abstract
Although the physician survey has become an important tool for oncology-focused health services research, such surveys often achieve low response rates. This mini-review reports the results of a structured review of the literature relating to increasing response rates for physician surveys, as well as our own experience from a survey of physicians as to their referral practices for suspected haematologic malignancy in the United States. PubMed and PsychINFO databases were used to identify methodological articles assessing factors that influence response rates for physician surveys; the results were tabulated and reviewed for trends. We also analysed the impact of a follow-up telephone call by a physician investigator to initial non-responders in our own mailed physician survey, comparing the characteristics of those who responded before vs after the call. The systematic review suggested that monetary incentives and paper (vs web or email) surveys increase response rates. In our own survey, follow-up telephone calls increased the response rate from 43.7% to 70.5%, with little discernible difference in the characteristics of early vs later responders. We conclude that in addition to monetary incentives and paper surveys, physician-to-physician follow-up telephone calls are an effective method to increase response rates in oncology-focused physician surveys.Keywords
This publication has 57 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Population-Based Assessment of Specialty Physician Involvement in Cancer Clinical TrialsJNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2011
- Response rates in postal surveys of healthcare professionals between 1996 and 2005: An observational studyBMC Health Services Research, 2009
- Follow-up care for cancer survivors: the views of cliniciansBritish Journal of Cancer, 2009
- Methods to increase response to postal and electronic questionnairesCochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2009
- How to obtain excellent response rates when surveying physiciansFamily Practice, 2008
- Mixing Web and Mail Methods in a Survey of PhysiciansHealth Services Research, 2006
- Comparison of Responses to a $2 Bill versus a Chance to Win $250 in a Mail Survey of Emergency PhysiciansAcademic Emergency Medicine, 2004
- Comparison of Responses to a $2 Bill versus a Chance to Win $250 in a Mail Survey of Emergency PhysiciansAcademic Emergency Medicine, 2004
- Surveying general practitioners: a new avenueCurrent Medical Research and Opinion, 2004
- Caffeine, Cajoling, and Other Strategies to Maximize Clinician Survey Response RatesEvaluation & the Health Professions, 2002