Halo It’s Meat! the Effect of the Vegetarian Label on Calorie Perception and Food Choices
Authors:
- 26 August 2019
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Ecology of Food and Nutrition
- Vol. 59 (1) , 3-20
Abstract
In the last few years, vegetarian products have become a widespread dietary option in food industry to the point that large retail chains such as McDonald’s has offered a vegetarian burger to their customers (e.g., the Grand Veggie). In the present research, two studied investigated the influence of a vegetarian label on calorie perception, frequency consumption and food choices. In the first study (N = 211) participants were randomly assigned to an experimental design 2 (burger type: Grand Veggie vs Big Mac). In the second study (N = 915), participants were either exposed to a similar burger labeled vegetarian or a meat-based. Both studies show that vegetarian products are perceived as being less caloric than their non-vegetarian equivalents. However, participants do not report more intention to eat more vegetarian product and do not lead to differences in menu composition.Keywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- You taste what you see: Do organic labels bias taste perceptions?Food Quality and Preference, 2013
- Vegetarianism. A blossoming field of studyAppetite, 2012
- The “Fair Trade” EffectSocial Psychological and Personality Science, 2012
- The Dieter's ParadoxJournal of Consumer Psychology, 2010
- The Biasing Health Halos of Fast-Food Restaurant Health Claims: Lower Calorie Estimates and Higher Side-Dish Consumption IntentionsJournal of Consumer Research, 2007
- Licensing Effect in Consumer ChoiceJournal of Marketing Research, 2006
- Too good to be true: Dose insensitivity and stereotypical thinking of foods’ capacity to promote weight gainFood Quality and Preference, 2005
- Why Have Americans Become More Obese?SSRN Electronic Journal, 2003
- Gender differences in perceptions of the healthiness of foodsPsychology & Health, 2001
- A constant error in psychological ratings.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1920