Education and Cause-specific Mortality
Authors:
- Helene NordahlHNHelene Nordahl
- Theis LangeTLTheis Lange
- Merete OslerMOMerete Osler
- Finn DiderichsenFDFinn Diderichsen
- Ingelise AndersenIAIngelise Andersen
- Eva PrescottEPEva Prescott
- Anne TjønnelandATAnne Tjønneland
- Birgitte Lidegaard FrederiksenBFBirgitte Lidegaard Frederiksen
- Naja Hulvej RodNRNaja Hulvej Rod
- 1 May 2014
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Epidemiology
- Vol. 25 (3) , 389-396
Abstract
Differential exposures to behavioral risk factors have been shown to play an important mediating role on the education-mortality relation. However, little is known about the extent to which educational attainment interacts with health behavior, possibly through differential vulnerability. In a cohort study of 76,294 participants 30 to 70 years of age, we estimated educational differences in cause-specific mortality from 1980 through 2009 and the mediating role of behavioral risk factors (smoking, alcohol intake, physical activity, and body mass index). With the use of marginal structural models and three-way effect decomposition, we simultaneously regarded the behavioral risk factors as intermediates and clarified the role of their interaction with educational exposure. Rate differences in mortality comparing participants with low to high education were 1,277 (95% confidence interval = 1,062 to 1,492) per 100,000 person-years for men and 746 (598 to 894) per 100,000 person-years for women. Smoking was the strongest mediator for cardiovascular disease, cancer, and respiratory disease mortality when conditioning on sex, age, and cohort. The proportion mediated through smoking was most pronounced in cancer mortality as a combination of the pure indirect effect, owing to differential exposure (men, 42% [25% to 75%]; women, 36% [17% to 74%]) and the mediated interactive effect, owing to differential vulnerability (men, 18% [2% to 35%], women, 26% [8% to 50%]). The mediating effects through body mass index, alcohol intake, or physical activity were partial and varied for the causes of deaths. Differential exposure and vulnerability should be addressed simultaneously, as these mechanisms are not mutually exclusive and may operate at the same time.Keywords
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- Education and Coronary Heart Disease Risk Associations May be Affected by Early-Life Common Prior Causes: A Propensity Matching AnalysisAnnals of Epidemiology, 2012
- Using Marginal Structural Models to Estimate the Direct Effect of Adverse Childhood Social Conditions on Onset of Heart Disease, Diabetes, and StrokeEpidemiology, 2012
- Association of Socioeconomic Position With Health Behaviors and MortalityJAMA, 2010
- Occupational social class, educational level, smoking and body mass index, and cause-specific mortality in men and women: a prospective study in the European Prospective Investigation of Cancer and Nutrition in Norfolk (EPIC-Norfolk) cohortEuropean Journal of Epidemiology, 2008
- Socioeconomic Inequalities in Health in 22 European CountriesNew England Journal of Medicine, 2008
- Health behaviours as explanations for educational level differences in cardiovascular and all-cause mortality: a follow-up of 60 000 men and women over 23 yearsEuropean Journal of Public Health, 2007
- Explaining the social gradient in coronary heart disease: comparing relative and absolute risk approachesJournal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 2006
- Can cardiovascular risk factors and lifestyle explain the educational inequalities in mortality from ischaemic heart disease and from other heart diseases? 26 year follow up of 50 000 Norwegian men and womenJournal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 2004
- How to evaluate interaction between causes: a review of practices in cardiovascular epidemiologyJournal of Internal Medicine, 1996
- The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1986