Uptake of the multi-arm multi-stage (MAMS) adaptive platform approach: a trial-registry review of late-phase randomised clinical trials
Open Access
Abstract
Background For medical conditions with numerous interventions worthy of investigation, there are many advantages of a multi-arm multi-stage (MAMS) platform trial approach. However, there is currently limited knowledge on uptake of the MAMS design, especially in the late-phase setting. We sought to examine uptake and characteristics of late-phase MAMS platform trials, to enable better planning for teams considering future use of this approach. Design We examined uptake of registered, late-phase MAMS platforms in the EU clinical trials register, Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number registry, Pan African Clinical Trials Registry, WHO International Clinical Trial Registry Platform and databases: PubMed, Medline, Cochrane Library, Global Health Library and EMBASE. Searching was performed and review data frozen on 1 April 2021. MAMS platforms were defined as requiring two or more comparison arms, with two or more trial stages, with an interim analysis allowing for stopping of recruitment to arms and typically the ability to add new intervention arms. Results 62 late-phase clinical trials using an MAMS approach were included. Overall, the number of late-phase trials using the MAMS design has been increasing since 2001 and been accelerated by COVID-19. The majority of current MAMS platforms were either targeting infectious diseases (52%) or cancers (29%) and all identified trials were for treatment interventions. 89% (55/62) of MAMS platforms were evaluating medications, with 45% (28/62) of the MAMS platforms having at least one or more repurposed medication as a comparison arm. Conclusions Historically, late-phase trials have adhered to long-established standard (two-arm) designs. However, the number of late-phase MAMS platform trials is increasing, across a range of different disease areas. This study highlights the potential scope of MAMS platform trials and may assist research teams considering use of this approach in the late-phase randomised clinical trial setting. PROSPERO registration number CRD42019153910.Keywords
Funding Information
- Medical Research Council (MC_UU_171339)
This publication has 54 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Brave New World of clinical cancer research: Adaptive biomarker‐driven trials integrating clinical practice with clinical researchMolecular Oncology, 2015
- More multiarm randomised trials of superiority are neededThe Lancet, 2014
- Trial unpredictability yields predictable therapy gainsNature, 2013
- Flexible trial design in practice - stopping arms for lack-of-benefit and adding research arms mid-trial in STAMPEDE: a multi-arm multi-stage randomized controlled trialTrials, 2012
- A National Cancer Clinical Trials Network: Recommendations From the Institute of MedicineAmerican Journal of Therapeutics, 2011
- Reflections on attempted Anglo-Japanese collaboration on STAMPEDE: A randomized controlled trial for men with prostate cancerInternational Journal of Urology, 2011
- Evaluation of New Platinum-Based Treatment Regimens in Advanced-Stage Ovarian Cancer: A Phase III Trial of the Gynecologic Cancer InterGroupJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2009
- Speeding up the Evaluation of New Agents in CancerJNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2008
- Treatment Success in CancerNew Cancer Treatment Successes Identified in Phase 3 Randomized Controlled Trials Conducted by the National Cancer Institute–Sponsored Cooperative Oncology Groups, 1955 to 2006Archives of internal medicine (1960), 2008
- Novel designs for multi‐arm clinical trials with survival outcomes with an application in ovarian cancerStatistics in Medicine, 2003