Warning Signs of Partner Abuse in Intimate Relationships: Gender Differences in Young Adults’ Perceptions of Seriousness
Authors:
- 28 March 2017
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of Interpersonal Violence
- Vol. 35 (7-8) , 1779-1802
Abstract
In response to the high rates of intimate partner abuse (IPA) among young adults and related negative health effects, this study examined 18- to 26-year-old Australians’ perceptions of unhealthy partner behaviors that may constitute early warning signs of abuse in intimate relationships. This research is the first to examine gender differences on this issue in a young adult population. A convenience sample of 49 males and 152 females (N = 201) completed an online survey, rating how seriously they viewed a list of partner warning sign behaviors (WSBs). WSBs consisted of three subscales: Dominance-Possessiveness, Denigration, and Conflict-Retaliation. Participants’ perceived seriousness of WSBs was analyzed by gender and WSB type. Results revealed large and significant gender differences in perceptions of WSBs, with females likely to rate all WSBs more seriously than males. Furthermore, females’ responses were negatively skewed and leptokurtotic indicating high levels of convergence in the view that such behaviors are a concern. Analysis by WSB type revealed that conflict-retaliation behaviors were perceived most seriously by both genders, with more than half of males and 67% of females rating these as very serious. In contrast, significantly lower levels of perceived seriousness were observed for denigration and dominance-possessiveness behaviors. Half to two thirds of females viewed dominance-possessiveness and denigration WSBs as very serious, respectively, whereas just one third of males endorsed both these WSB types as very serious. Findings reveal that females have a heightened awareness of the subtle warning signs of abuse in intimate relationships and that as partner WSBs become more overt, both genders are more likely to recognize them as serious. Findings also indicate that subtler WSBs, such as control and denigration, are less readily identified as unhealthy, particularly among males.Keywords
This publication has 41 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Intimate Partner Violence Stigmatization Model and Barriers to Help SeekingBasic and Applied Social Psychology, 2013
- Partner Abuse Prevention Education: An Integrative Approach to Program Development and EvaluationPartner Abuse, 2013
- Gender symmetry and mutuality in perpetration of clinical-level partner violence: Empirical evidence and implications for prevention and treatmentAggression and Violent Behavior, 2011
- Girls at Risk of Chronic Partner Abuse: Assertive Tendency, Warning Signs, Risk Sensitivity, and Self-ConfidenceJournal of Relationships Research, 2011
- Before they're victims: Rethinking youth-targeted relationship abuse prevention in AustraliaAustralian Psychologist, 2009
- Patterns of Intimate Partner Violence Victimization from Adolescence to Young Adulthood in a Nationally Representative SampleJournal of Adolescent Health, 2009
- Adolescent Girls’ Responses to Warning Signs of Abuse in Romantic RelationshipsJournal of Interpersonal Violence, 2009
- No One Type of Intimate Partner Abuse: Exploring Physical and Non-Physical Abuse Among Intimate PartnersJournal of Family Violence, 2009
- Adaptive Aspects of Social Cognitive Functioning in Adulthood: Age–Related Goal and Knowledge InfluencesSocial Cognition, 2006
- Health consequences of intimate partner violenceThe Lancet, 2002