Validity and Reproducibility of an Electronic Food Frequency Questionnaire in Argentinian Adults
Authors:
- Rocio Victoria GiliRGRocio Victoria Gili
- Sara LeesonSLSara Leeson
- Belén CarlinoBCBelén Carlino
- Ismael Alejandro Contreras-GuillénICIsmael Alejandro Contreras-Guillén
- Daniel XutucDXDaniel Xutuc
- Marcia Cristina Teixeira MartinsMMMarcia Cristina Teixeira Martins
- María del Pilar DíazMDMaría del Pilar Díaz
- Gina Segovia-SiapcoGSGina Segovia-Siapco
- Sandaly Oliveira da Silva PachecoSPSandaly Oliveira da Silva Pacheco
- Fabio Juliano PachecoFPFabio Juliano Pacheco
Open Access
Abstract
This study aimed to validate a semiquantitative electronic food frequency questionnaire (eFFQ) in estimating the intake of a comprehensive list of nutrients and bioactive compounds among adults from six regions of Argentina using multiple 24 h dietary recall (24HR) as a reference. A total of 163 adults completed two administrations of the eFFQ and four 24HRs. The paired t-test/Wilcoxon signed-rank test, Spearman/Pearson correlations, cross-classification, weighted kappa statistics, and Bland–Altman plots were employed to determine relative validity. To determine reproducibility, intraclass correlations (ICC), cross-classification, and weighted kappa statistics were calculated. For relative validity, crude correlations ranged from 0.15 to 0.57; energy adjustment and de-attenuation slightly improved most of these correlations. In cross-classification analysis, agreements within one quintile adjacent to exact agreement (EA ± 1) ranged from 52.2% to ~74%; extreme misclassifications were < 7%. For reproducibility, the crude ICC ranged from 0.29 to 0.85, showing moderate to good correlations for most nutrients. Cross-classification analysis showed agreement levels for the EA ± 1 quintile of 70.6% to 87.7%. Weighted kappa values ranged from 0.21 to 0.62. The results show that this eFFQ is relatively valid in ranking adults according to their nutrient intake and has an acceptable reproducibility, yet it slightly overestimates the intake of most nutrients.Keywords
Funding Information
- Adventist University of River Plate (2190339, RESOL-2018-2704-APN-DIR#CONICET)
- Loma Linda University Health (2190339, RESOL-2018-2704-APN-DIR#CONICET)
- National Scientific and Technical Council (CONICET) (2190339, RESOL-2018-2704-APN-DIR#CONICET)
This publication has 68 references indexed in Scilit:
- Relative Validity and Reproducibility of a Food Frequency Questionnaire for Assessing Dietary Patterns and Food Group Intake in Older New Zealand Adults: The Researching Eating, Activity, and Cognitive Health StudyJournal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, 2021
- Non-nutrients and nutrients from Latin American fruits for the prevention of cardiovascular diseasesFood Research International, 2021
- Dietary fat, saturated fatty acid, and monounsaturated fatty acid intakes and risk of bone fracture: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studiesOsteoporosis International, 2018
- Reproducibility and validity of an FFQ developed for adults in Nanjing, ChinaBritish Journal of Nutrition, 2016
- Web-based studies: The future in nutritional epidemiology (and overarching epidemiology) for the benefit of public health?Preventive Medicine, 2012
- Race-specific validation of food intake obtained from a comprehensive FFQ: the Adventist Health Study-2Public Health Nutrition, 2011
- Priority actions for the non-communicable disease crisisThe Lancet, 2011
- Reproducibility of an FFQ validated in SpainPublic Health Nutrition, 2010
- Estimating Usual Dietary Intake Distributions: Adjusting for Measurement Error and Nonnormality in 24‐Hour Food Intake Data1997
- STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENTThe Lancet, 1986