Perceived quality of health care services among people with osteoarthritis – results from a nationwide survey
Authors:
Open Access
- 1 September 2015
- journal article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Patient Preference and Adherence
- Vol. ume 9, 1255-1261
Abstract
Objective: To assess the perceived quality of care received by people with osteoarthritis (OA) in Norway and explore factors associated with the quality of care. Methods: A national survey in which members of the Norwegian Rheumatism Association with OA registered as their main diagnosis completed a questionnaire. The perceived quality of care was reported on a 17-item OsteoArthritis Quality Indicator questionnaire, covering both pharmacological and non-pharmacological aspects of OA care. In addition, the four-page questionnaire covered areas related to demographic characteristics, the location and impact of the OA, and utilization and satisfaction with health care services. The quality of care is calculated as pass rates, where the numerator represents the number of indicators passed and the denominator represents the number of eligible persons. Results: In total, 1,247 participants (response rate 57%) completed the questionnaire. Mean age was 68 years (standard deviation 32) and 1,142 (92%) were women. Respondents reported OA in hand only (12.4%), hip only (7.3%), knee only (10.4%), in two locations (42%) or all three locations (27%). The overall OsteoArthritis Quality Indicator pass rate was 47% (95% confidence interval [CI] 46%–48%), and it was higher for pharmacological aspects (53% [51%–54%]) than for non-pharmacological aspects of care (44% [43%–46%]). The pass rate for the individual quality indicators ranged from 8% for “referral for weight reduction” to 81% for “receiving advice about exercises”. Satisfaction with care was strongly associated with perceived quality. The pass rate for those who were “very satisfied” was 33% (25%–40%) higher than those who were “very unsatisfied” with care. Conclusion: While the OA patient seems to be rather satisfied with the perceived OA care, there is still room for improvement in the quality of care. Although the quality of care in the present study is somewhat higher than in other studies, less than 50% of the recommended care has been provided.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Quality of hip and knee osteoarthritis management in primary health care in a Norwegian county: a cross-sectional surveyBMC Health Services Research, 2014
- Incidence, Prevalence, Costs, and Impact on Disability of Common Conditions Requiring Rehabilitation in the United States: Stroke, Spinal Cord Injury, Traumatic Brain Injury, Multiple Sclerosis, Osteoarthritis, Rheumatoid Arthritis, Limb Loss, and Back PainArchives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 2014
- Years lived with disability (YLDs) for 1160 sequelae of 289 diseases and injuries 1990–2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010The Lancet, 2012
- The Contribution of Osteoarthritis to Functional Limitations and DisabilityClinics in Geriatric Medicine, 2010
- Economic burden of knee and hip osteoarthritis in spainArthritis Care & Research, 2009
- Prevalence and burden of osteoarthritis: results from a population survey in Norway.2008
- Knee osteoarthritis clinical practice guidelines -- how are we doing?2007
- Burden of major musculoskeletal conditions.2003
- Direct medical costs unique to people with arthritis.1997
- Indirect and nonmedical costs among people with rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis compared with nonarthritic controls.1997