When can the Bland & Altman limits of agreement method be used and when it should not be used
Author:
- 1 September 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
- Vol. 137, 176-181
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Assessing bias, precision, and agreement in method comparison studiesStatistical Methods in Medical Research, 2019
- MethodCompare: An R package to assess bias and precision in method comparison studiesStatistical Methods in Medical Research, 2018
- Biasplot: A Package to Effective Plots to Assess Bias and Precision in Method Comparison StudiesThe Stata Journal: Promoting communications on statistics and Stata, 2017
- Effective plots to assess bias and precision in method comparison studiesStatistical Methods in Medical Research, 2016
- A heteroscedastic measurement error model for method comparison data with replicate measurementsStatistics in Medicine, 2015
- Measuring agreement in method comparison studies with heteroscedastic measurementsStatistics in Medicine, 2013
- Comparing methods of measurement: Extending the LoA by regressionStatistics in Medicine, 2009
- Measuring agreement in method comparison studiesStatistical Methods in Medical Research, 1999
- STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENTThe Lancet, 1986
- Measurement in Medicine: The Analysis of Method Comparison StudiesJournal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series D (The Statistician), 1983