Predicting intraday jumps in stock prices using liquidity measures and technical indicators
Authors:
- 31 July 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Forecasting
- Vol. 40 (3) , 416-438
Abstract
Predicting intraday stock jumps is a significant but challenging problem in finance. Due to the instantaneity and imperceptibility characteristics of intraday stock jumps, relevant studies on their predictability remain limited. This paper proposes a data‐driven approach to predict intraday stock jumps using the information embedded in liquidity measures and technical indicators. Specifically, a trading day is divided into a series of 5‐min intervals, and at the end of each interval, the candidate attributes defined by liquidity measures and technical indicators are input into machine learning algorithms to predict the arrival of a stock jump as well as its direction in the following 5‐min interval. An empirical study is conducted using level‐2 high‐frequency data of 1271 stocks on the Shenzhen Stock Exchange of China to validate our approach. The results provide initial evidence of the predictability of jump arrivals and jump directions using level‐2 stock data as well as the effectiveness of using a combination of liquidity measures and technical indicators for such prediction. We also reveal the superiority of using random forest compared with other machine learning algorithms in building prediction models. Importantly, our study provides a portable data‐driven approach that exploits liquidity and technical information from level‐2 stock data to predict intraday price jumps of individual stocks.Keywords
Funding Information
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (71471081)
This publication has 50 references indexed in Scilit:
- Liquidity Dynamics Around Jumps: The Evidence from the Warsaw Stock ExchangeEmerging Markets Finance and Trade, 2016
- Jumps in High-Frequency Data: Spurious Detections, Dynamics, and NewsManagement Science, 2016
- Jump-robust volatility estimation using nearest neighbor truncationJournal of Econometrics, 2012
- Testing for jumps in a discretely observed processThe Annals of Statistics, 2009
- No-arbitrage semi-martingale restrictions for continuous-time volatility models subject to leverage effects, jumps and i.i.d. noise: Theory and testable distributional implicationsJournal of Econometrics, 2007
- Econometrics of Testing for Jumps in Financial Economics Using Bipower VariationJournal of Financial Econometrics, 2005
- Power and Bipower Variation with Stochastic Volatility and JumpsJournal of Financial Econometrics, 2004
- Estimating quadratic variation using realized varianceJournal of Applied Econometrics, 2002
- The distribution of realized stock return volatilityJournal of Financial Economics, 2001
- Answering the Skeptics: Yes, Standard Volatility Models do Provide Accurate ForecastsInternational Economic Review, 1998