Morbidity in hospitalized patients receiving human albumin: A meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials*
Authors:
- Jean-Louis VincentJVJean-Louis Vincent
- Roberta J. NavickisRNRoberta J. Navickis
- Mahlon M. WilkesMWMahlon M. Wilkes
- 1 October 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Critical Care Medicine
- Vol. 32 (10) , 2029-2038
Abstract
To determine the effect of albumin administration on morbidity in acutely ill hospitalized patients. Computer searches of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library; hand searches of journals and Index Medicus; inquiries with investigators and fluid product suppliers; and examination of reference lists. No language or time period restrictions were adopted. Randomized, controlled trials comparing the administration of albumin with that of crystalloid, no albumin, or lower-dose albumin. Two investigators independently extracted data. The primary endpoint for the meta-analysis was morbidity, defined as the incidence of complications, including death. Trial quality was evaluated by blinding, allocation concealment, presence of morbidity as a study endpoint, and individual patient crossover. Seventy-one trials were included in the categories of surgery or trauma, burns, hypoalbuminemia, high-risk neonates, ascites, and other indications. The 3,782 randomized patients in the included trials experienced a total of 3,287 complications, including 515 deaths and 2,772 cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, hepatic, infectious, renal, respiratory, and other complications. Albumin significantly reduced overall morbidity, with a risk ratio of 0.92 (confidence interval [CI], 0.86-0.98). Control group albumin dose significantly affected the incidence of complications (p = .002). In 32 trials with no albumin administered to the control group, the risk ratio was 0.77 (CI, 0.67-0.88) compared with 0.89 (CI, 0.80-1.00) in 20 trials with control patients receiving low-dose albumin and 1.07 (CI, 0.96-1.20) in 19 trials with moderate-dose control group albumin. Albumin reduces morbidity in acutely ill hospitalized patients. Concomitant administration of albumin in the control group can obscure the effects of albumin on clinical outcome in randomized trials.Keywords
This publication has 87 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Comparison of Albumin and Saline for Fluid Resuscitation in the Intensive Care UnitNew England Journal of Medicine, 2004
- Understanding the Treatment Preferences of Seriously Ill PatientsNew England Journal of Medicine, 2002
- Reliable Estimation of Generalized Linear Mixed Models using Adaptive QuadratureThe Stata Journal: Promoting communications on statistics and Stata, 2002
- Patient Survival after Human Albumin AdministrationAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2001
- Cochrane Injuries Group Albumin ReviewersWhy albumin may not workBMJ, 1998
- Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical testBMJ, 1997
- A Meta-analysis of 16 Randomized Controlled Trials to Evaluate Computer-Based Clinical Reminder Systems for Preventive Care in the Ambulatory SettingJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 1996
- Maintenance of Serum Albumin Levels in Pediatric Burn PatientsThe Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care, 1995
- Empirical Evidence of BiasJAMA, 1995
- PLASMA PROTEIN STUDIES ON NORMAL NEWBORN AND PREMATURE INFANTSA.M.A. American Journal of Diseases of Children, 1948