The All-on-four concept for fixed full-arch rehabilitation of the edentulous maxilla and mandible: a longitudinal study in Japanese patients with 3–17-year follow-up and analysis of risk factors for survival rate
Authors:
Open Access
- 8 November 2023
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in International Journal of Implant Dentistry
- Vol. 9 (1) , 1-17
Abstract
Purpose: Implant-supported immediately loaded fixed full-arch rehabilitation via All-on-four treatment yields good long-term results for both the maxilla and the mandible. However, the risk factors affecting long-term implant survival are unknown, and the long-term prognosis of All-on-four concept procedures in Japanese individuals has not been elucidated. We aimed to determine the cumulative implant survival rate after 3–17-year follow-up and identify the associated risk factors. Methods: We analysed 561 cases (307 maxillae, 254 mandibles) with 2364 implants (1324 maxillae, 1040 mandibles) that received All-on-four treatment. We investigated the cumulative implant- and patient-level survival rates and various risk factors for implant failure. Statistical analysis was performed using the log-rank test for differences in Kaplan–Meier curves, univariate analysis using the Chi-square test, and multivariate analysis for risk factors affecting the survival rate. Results: The cumulative survival rate was 94.4% by patient level and 97.4% by implant level for the maxilla, and 96.7% by patient level and 98.9% by implant for the mandible, with up to 17 years of follow-up. The maxillary survival rate at the implant level was significantly lower (p < 0.05). Furthermore, the maxillary survival rate within 24 months was significantly lower at the implant level (p < 0.01). Multivariate analysis revealed that the maxilla was the most significant risk factor (p < 0.01). Conclusions: All-on-four treatment yielded high long-term survival rates in Japanese patients. However, the maxilla showed a significantly lower cumulative survival rate than the mandible, while early failure was significantly higher. Furthermore, the maxilla was a significant risk factor influencing the survival rate.Keywords
This publication has 35 references indexed in Scilit:
- Clinical efficacy of immediate implant loading protocols compared to conventional loading depending on the type of the restoration: a systematic reviewClinical Oral Implants Research, 2014
- Annual failure rates and marginal bone‐level changes of immediate compared to conventional loading of dental implants. A systematic review of the literature and meta‐analysisClinical Oral Implants Research, 2014
- Consensus Statements and Clinical Recommendations for Implant Loading ProtocolsThe International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants, 2014
- “All‐on‐4” Immediate‐Function Concept for Completely Edentulous Maxillae: A Clinical Report on the Medium (3 Years) and Long‐Term (5 Years) OutcomesClinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, 2011
- The All-on-Four Immediate Function Treatment Concept With NobelActive Implants: A Retrospective StudyJournal of Oral Implantology, 2011
- Failing Factors Associated With Osseointegrated Dental Implant LossImplant Dentistry, 2007
- Tilting of splinted implants for improved prosthodontic support: A two-dimensional finite element analysisThe Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 2007
- Smoking interferes with the prognosis of dental implant treatment: a systematic review and meta‐analysisJournal of Clinical Periodontology, 2007
- Influence of smoking on osseointegrated implant failure: a meta‐analysisClinical Oral Implants Research, 2006
- “All‐on‐Four” Immediate‐Function Concept with Brånemark System® Implants for Completely Edentulous Mandibles: A Retrospective Clinical StudyClinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, 2003