Getting trustworthy guidelines into the hands of decision-makers and supporting their consideration of contextual factors for implementation globally: recommendation mapping of COVID-19 guidelines
- 1 July 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
- Vol. 135, 182-186
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
Funding Information
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research
- World Health Organization
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- Cochrane Rapid Reviews Methods Group offers evidence-informed guidance to conduct rapid reviewsJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2021
- A Bibliometric Network Analysis of Coronavirus during the First Eight Months of COVID-19 in 2020International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2021
- Developing trustworthy recommendations as part of an urgent response (1–2 weeks): a GRADE concept paperJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2021
- Using GRADE in situations of emergencies and urgencies: certainty in evidence and recommendations matters during the COVID-19 pandemic, now more than ever and no matter whatJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2020
- Rapid review methods more challenging during COVID-19: commentary with a focus on 8 knowledge synthesis stepsJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2020
- Management in the paediatric wards facing novel coronavirus infection: a rapid review of guidelines and consensusesBMJ Open, 2020
- Pandemic publishing poses a new COVID-19 challengeNature Human Behaviour, 2020
- Scope, quality, and inclusivity of clinical guidelines produced early in the covid-19 pandemic: rapid reviewBMJ, 2020
- The “Infodemic” of Journal Publication Associated with the Novel Coronavirus DiseaseJournal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 2020
- A quality evaluation of guidelines on five different viruses causing public health emergencies of international concernAnnals of Translational Medicine, 2020