Barbed suture in minimally invasive hysterectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- 21 February 2015
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics
- Vol. 292 (3) , 489-497
Abstract
Total laparoscopic or robotic hysterectomy represents one of the most performed gynecological procedures nowadays. Minimally invasive procedures seem to increase the risk of vaginal cuff dehiscence (VCD). Barbed suture is a new class of suture introduced to aid surgeons during laparoscopic suturing, with the aim to reduce operative time, blood loss, and vaginal dehiscence. We identified all articles that report a series of laparoscopic or robotic-assisted hysterectomy using barbed suture compared to conventional suture for vaginal cuff closure. The main outcome measures were vaginal cuff suturing time, vaginal bleeding, and vaginal dehiscence with or without small bowel evisceration. Suturing time was meta-analyzed as the standardized mean difference, which is the difference in means of two arms divided by pooled standard deviation with 95 % confidence intervals. For vaginal bleeding and dehiscence risk difference were calculated for each study and then meta-analyzed. Fixed models were considered if heterogeneity was low (I 2 < 50 %), otherwise random models were preferred. We show that minor bleeding (RD = 0, 95 % CI 0.03–0.03; p value = 0.907) and VCD (RD = −0.01, 95 % CI 0.02–0.00; p value = 0.119) are comparable in minimally invasive hysterectomy with or without the use of barbed suture. The major bleeding (RD = −0.03; 95 % CI 0.05–0.00; p value = 0.047) appears borderline significant, but the difference between the two types of sutures is not high and the upper limit of 95 % IC is equal to 0 so they were considered comparable. Instead, meta-analysis on vaginal cuff suturing time demonstrates that suturing time is reduced with the use of barbed suture (SMD = −0.96, 95 % CI 1.26–0.70; p value <0.001). Barbed suture is safe and well tolerated as traditional sutures and is associated with reduced operative time of laparoscopic vaginal vault closure.Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Barbed Suture for Vaginal Cuff Closure in Laparoscopic HysterectomyJSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoscopic & Robotic Surgeons, 2014
- Single-site port robotic-assisted hysterectomy: a systematic reviewArchives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2013
- Vaginal cuff closure with absorbable bidirectional barbed suture during total laparoscopic hysterectomyEuropean Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 2013
- Barbed Versus Standard Suture: A Randomized Trial for Laparoscopic Vaginal Cuff ClosureJournal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, 2013
- Bidirectional Barbed Suture in Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy and Lymph Node Dissection for Endometrial Cancer: Technical Evaluation and 1-Year Follow-Up of 61 PatientsJournal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques, 2013
- A comparison of 2 methods of vaginal cuff closure during robotic hysterectomyInternational Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 2012
- Vaginal cuff dehiscence in laparoscopic hysterectomy: influence of various suturing methods of the vaginal vaultGynecological Surgery, 2012
- Decreased Incidence of Vaginal Cuff Dehiscence after Laparoscopic Closure with Bidirectional Barbed SutureJournal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, 2011
- Bidirectional Barbed Suture: An Evaluation of Safety and Clinical OutcomesJSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoscopic & Robotic Surgeons, 2010
- Hysterectomy Rates in the United States, 2003Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2007