Oral stepdown in Gram‐positive bloodstream infections: A step in the right direction
- 18 February 2023
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wiley in Pharmacotherapy: The Journal of Human Pharmacology and Drug Therapy
- Vol. 43 (3) , 247-256
Abstract
Bloodstream infections (BSIs) due to Gram‐positive organisms have traditionally been treated with prolonged courses of intravenous antimicrobials. However, this dogma is associated with substantial burden to the patient and health care system. Consequently, there is growing interest in the utilization of oral stepdown therapy, defined as the transition of intravenous therapy to an active oral agent, for this indication. This review highlights available literature examining oral stepdown in adult patients with BSI due to commonly encountered Gram‐positive pathogens, including Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus spp., and Enterococcus spp. Support for oral stepdown in this setting is primarily derived from observational studies subject to selection bias. Nevertheless, this treatment strategy exhibits promising potential in carefully selected patients as it is consistently associated with reductions in hospital length of stay without jeopardizing clinical cure or survivability. Prospective, randomized trials are needed for validation of oral stepdown in Gram‐positive BSI and to identify the optimal patient population and regimen.Keywords
This publication has 48 references indexed in Scilit:
- Incidence of bloodstream infection: a review of population-based studiesClinical Microbiology and Infection, 2013
- Bloodstream Infection, Venous Thrombosis, and Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters: Reappraising the EvidenceThe American Journal of Medicine, 2012
- Association between timing of antibiotic administration and mortality from septic shock in patients treated with a quantitative resuscitation protocol*Critical Care Medicine, 2011
- Mutant Selection Window Hypothesis UpdatedClinical Infectious Diseases, 2007
- Duration of hypotension before initiation of effective antimicrobial therapy is the critical determinant of survival in human septic shock*Critical Care Medicine, 2006
- Linezolid versus vancomycin for Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia: pooled analysis of randomized studiesJournal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 2005
- A Randomized Clinical Trial to Compare Fleroxacin-Rifampicin with Flucloxacillin or Vancomycin for the Treatment of Staphylococcal InfectionClinical Infectious Diseases, 2004
- Oral antibiotic treatment of right-sided staphylococcal endocarditis in injection drug users: Prospective randomized comparison with parenteral therapyThe American Journal of Medicine, 1996
- Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole Compared with Vancomycin for the Treatment of Staphylococcus aureus InfectionAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1992
- TREATMENT OF RIGHT-SIDED STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS ENDOCARDITIS IN INTRAVENOUS DRUG USERS WITH CIPROFLOXACIN AND RIFAMPICINThe Lancet, 1989