The retention of non-commercial hardwoods in mixed stands maintains higher avian biodiversity than clear-cutting
- 27 April 2022
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Forestry: An International Journal of Forest Research
Abstract
A diverse landscape can support a more diverse range of species and allow for more complex community structures. In forested habitats, openings and changes in tree composition allow for a higher species richness due to the greater chance of niche occupancy. Knowledge about these relationships may be useful for adapting forest harvesting strategies to, for example, support bird diversity conservation and studies are required to understand how different harvesting strategies influence forest structure and bird diversity. Here, we used Autonomous Recording Units (ARU) to record dawn signalling of forest birds between two forest-harvesting treatment types (complete clear-cuts and hardwood-retention patches) vs control forest patches in the John Prince Research Forest, British Columbia, Canada. We compared Species Richness and Shannon diversity as detected through identifying species in audio recordings, across treatments. The observed Species Richness and Shannon diversity did differ between the Retention treatment and Forest controls when controlling for number of individuals sampled, but both had higher Species Richness and Shannon diversity of passerine species than the Clear-cut treatments. When comparing species composition, we found that forest-associated species were disproportionately detected in Forest controls compared to Clear-cut treatments but detected at intermediate levels in Retention treatments. Species associated with early-seral habitats, though, had disproportionate detection in Clear-cut treatments compared to Forest controls, but also showed expected detections in Retention treatments. These results suggest that partial harvesting and retention of non-commercial hardwoods, can help retain forest-associated species while also helping attract early-seral avian species; this can help increase the overall diversity of the landscape while still making logging profitable. Further research should be conducted to determine the value of this retained habitat at different spatial scales to understand the impacts that it may have for larger-scale deployment.Keywords
This publication has 31 references indexed in Scilit:
- Moving riparian management guidelines towards a natural disturbance model: An example using boreal riparian and shoreline forest bird communitiesForest Ecology and Management, 2009
- Breeding birds in hemiboreal clear-cuts: tree-retention effects in relation to site typeForestry: An International Journal of Forest Research, 2007
- Understorey vegetation in spruce-dominated forests in eastern Finland and Russian Karelia: Successional patterns after anthropogenic and natural disturbancesForest Ecology and Management, 2005
- Spatial patterns, density changes and implications on biodiversity for old trees in the boreal landscape of northern SwedenBiological Conservation, 2004
- Individual legacy trees influence vertebrate wildlife diversity in commercial forestsForest Ecology and Management, 2004
- Songbird abundance in clear-cut and burned stands: a comparison of natural disturbance and forest managementCanadian Journal of Forest Research, 2002
- Bird responses to partial retention timber harvesting in central interior British ColumbiaForest Ecology and Management, 2001
- Bird communities associated with live residual tree patches within cut blocks and burned habitat in mixedwood boreal forestsCanadian Journal of Forest Research, 2000
- CHANGES IN BIRD COMMUNITIES IN BOREAL MIXEDWOOD FOREST: HARVEST AND WILDFIRE EFFECTS OVER 30 YEARSEcological Applications, 1999
- How Are Extensive, Human-Caused Habitat Alterations Expressed on the Scale of Local Bird Populations in Boreal Forests?Ornis Scandinavica, 1986