The Interaction With Task-induced Activity is More Important Than Polarization: A tDCS Study
- 1 March 2015
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Brain Stimulation
- Vol. 8 (2) , 269-276
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 51 references indexed in Scilit:
- Modulation of motor performance and motor learning by transcranial direct current stimulationCurrent Opinion in Neurology, 2011
- A primer on priming the human motor cortexClinical Neurophysiology, 2010
- Direct Current Stimulation Promotes BDNF-Dependent Synaptic Plasticity: Potential Implications for Motor LearningNeuron, 2010
- Consensus: Can transcranial direct current stimulation and transcranial magnetic stimulation enhance motor learning and memory formation?Brain Stimulation, 2008
- Transcranial direct current stimulation: State of the art 2008Brain Stimulation, 2008
- Modifying motor learning through gating and homeostatic metaplasticityBrain Stimulation, 2008
- Brain polarization in humans: a reappraisal of an old tool for prolonged non-invasive modulation of brain excitabilityClinical Neurophysiology, 2003
- Pharmacological approach to the mechanisms of transcranial DC-stimulation-induced after-effects of human motor cortex excitabilityBrain, 2002
- Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulationThe Journal of Physiology, 2000
- The action of brief polarizing currents on the cerebral cortex of the rat (1) during current flow and (2) in the production of long‐lasting after‐effectsThe Journal of Physiology, 1964