Targeted Prostate Biopsy: How, When, and Why? A Systematic Review
Authors:
- Giacomo RebezGRGiacomo Rebez
- Maria BarbieroMBMaria Barbiero
- Franco Alchiede SimonatoFSFranco Alchiede Simonato
- Francesco ClapsFCFrancesco Claps
- Salvatore SiracusanoSalvatore Siracusano
- Rosa GiaimoRGRosa Giaimo
- Gabriele TuloneGTGabriele Tulone
- Fabio VianelloFVFabio Vianello
- Alchiede SimonatoAlchiede Simonato
- Nicola PavanNPNicola Pavan
Open Access
- 26 August 2024
- journal article
- review article
- Published by MDPI AG in Diagnostics
- Vol. 14 (17) , 1864
Abstract
Objective: Prostate cancer, the second most diagnosed cancer among men, requires precise diagnostic techniques to ensure effective treatment. This review explores the technological advancements, optimal application conditions, and benefits of targeted prostate biopsies facilitated by multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI). Methods: A systematic literature review was conducted to compare traditional 12-core systematic biopsies guided by transrectal ultrasound with targeted biopsy techniques using mpMRI. We searched electronic databases including PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science from January 2015 to December 2024 using keywords such as “targeted prostate biopsy”, “fusion prostate biopsy”, “cognitive prostate biopsy”, “MRI-guided biopsy”, and “transrectal ultrasound prostate biopsy”. Studies comparing various biopsy methods were included, and data extraction focused on study characteristics, patient demographics, biopsy techniques, diagnostic outcomes, and complications. Conclusion: mpMRI-guided targeted biopsies enhance the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer while reducing unnecessary biopsies and the detection of insignificant cancers. These targeted approaches preserve or improve diagnostic accuracy and patient outcomes, minimizing the risks associated with overdiagnosis and overtreatment. By utilizing mpMRI, targeted biopsies allow for precise targeting of suspicious regions within the prostate, providing a cost-effective method that reduces the number of biopsies performed. This review highlights the importance of integrating advanced imaging techniques into prostate cancer diagnosis to improve patient outcomes and quality of life.Keywords
This publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- Unleashing the Power of Artificial Intelligence and Fusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging–Targeted Biopsy: Transforming Prostate Cancer DiagnosisEuropean Urology Oncology, 2023
- Pan-segmental intraprostatic lesions involving mid-gland and apex of prostate (mid-apical lesions): assessing the true value of extreme apical biopsy coresWorld Journal of Urology, 2022
- Artificial intelligence trained with integration of multiparametric MR‐US imaging data and fusion biopsy trajectory‐proven pathology data for 3D prediction of prostate cancer: A proof‐of‐concept studyThe Prostate, 2022
- Transperineal Magnetic Resonance Imaging–Targeted Biopsy May Perform Better Than Transrectal Route in the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-analysisClinical Genitourinary Cancer, 2019
- What Is the Negative Predictive Value of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Excluding Prostate Cancer at Biopsy? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis from the European Association of Urology Prostate Cancer Guidelines PanelEuropean Urology, 2017
- Diagnostic Pathway with Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Versus Standard Pathway: Results from a Randomized Prospective Study in Biopsy-naïve Patients with Suspected Prostate CancerEuropean Urology, 2017
- Comparing Three Different Techniques for Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Prostate Biopsies: A Systematic Review of In-bore versus Magnetic Resonance Imaging-transrectal Ultrasound fusion versus Cognitive Registration. Is There a Preferred Technique?European Urology, 2017
- Transperineal Versus Transrectal MRI/TRUS Fusion Targeted Biopsy: Detection Rate of Clinically Significant Prostate CancerClinical Genitourinary Cancer, 2017
- A Randomized Controlled Trial To Assess and Compare the Outcomes of Two-core Prostate Biopsy Guided by Fused Magnetic Resonance and Transrectal Ultrasound Images and Traditional 12-core Systematic BiopsyEuropean Urology, 2016
- Comparison of MR/Ultrasound Fusion–Guided Biopsy With Ultrasound-Guided Biopsy for the Diagnosis of Prostate CancerJAMA, 2015