The difficult ureter: what is the incidence of pre-stenting?
Authors:
- 1 January 2011
- journal article
- Published by Royal College of Surgeons of England in The Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England
- Vol. 93 (1) , 31-33
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Difficulty may be encountered with retrograde access for rigid and flexible ureterorenoscopy (URS) due to anatomic abnormalities, a narrow ureteric lumen, tortuous ureteric path or previous instrumentation. Ureteric dilatation using a balloon or tapered dilator can occasionally fail and will usually lead to the placement of a ureteric stent. We present our experience and incidence of pre-stenting after failed standard access and dilatation techniques, the aim being to quote a figure for the patient at the time of consent. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data were collected prospectively from a single surgeon at a regional tertiary referral stone unit. The outcomes of those patients pre-stented, for failed access, were recorded. RESULTS: Between December 2007 and December 2008, a total of 119 patients underwent flexible and rigid URS. Mean patient age was 49 years (range, 19–86 years). Of these, 107 cases were undertaken for urolithiasis and 12 cases for diagnosis of upper tract malignancy. 12% (13/107) of cases were for pain and non-diagnostic imaging and 8.4% (9/107) of patients were pre-stented because of failed access, without complication, and subsequently had successful interval treatment. Of the remaining successful cases of confirmed urolithiasis, 33% (28/85) and 67% (56/85) were undertaken for ureteric and renal calculi, respectively. Stone clearance rates were 83% (19/23) and 75% (3/4) for lower pole renal calculi 5–10 mm and > 10 mm in size, respectively. The overall clearance rate for lower pole calculi was 81% (22/27). The ureteric stone clearance rate was 86% (24/28) rising to 92% (24/26) in those solitary stones less than 10 mm in size. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of ureteric pre-stenting in a tertiary referral unit was 8% and should be considered and indeed discussed with patients when obtaining pre-operative consent, especially for purely elective, non-urgent, upper tract cases. The alternative for these difficult, tight ureters is extensive balloon dilatation, with the risk of trauma and the potential for long-term stricture formation.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- An Update and Practical Guide to Renal Stone ManagementNephron Clinical Practice, 2010
- 2007 Guideline for the Management of Ureteral CalculiEuropean Urology, 2007
- Management of renal stone disease in obese patientsNature Reviews Endocrinology, 2007
- Treatment of impacted lower third ureteral stones with the use of the ureteral access sheathUrological Research, 2006
- PROSPECTIVE, RANDOMIZED TRIAL COMPARING SHOCK WAVE LITHOTRIPSY AND URETEROSCOPY FOR LOWER POLE CALICEAL CALCULI 1 CM OR LESSJournal of Urology, 2005
- Ureteral stricture formation after removal of impacted calculi.1998
- URETERAL STRICTURE FORMATION AFTER REMOVAL OF IMPACTED CALCULIJournal of Urology, 1998
- Comparison of Acucise Endopyelotomy and Endoballoon Rupture for Management of Secondary Proximal Ureteral Stricture in the Porcine ModelJournal of Endourology, 1996