Task Sharing and Remote Delivery of Brief Interpersonal Counseling for Venezuelan Migrants and Refugees Living in Peru during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Mixed-Methods Pilot Study
Authors:
- M. Claire GreeneMGM. Claire Greene
- Mayra MuroMMMayra Muro
- Jeremy C. KaneJKJeremy C. Kane
- Erin YoungEYErin Young
- Alejandra Paniagua-AvilaAPAlejandra Paniagua-Avila
- Lucy Miller-SuchetLMLucy Miller-Suchet
- Maria NouelMNMaria Nouel
- Annie G. BonzABAnnie G. Bonz
- Maria CristobalMCMaria Cristobal
- Matthew SchojanMSMatthew Schojan
- Peter VentevogelPVPeter Ventevogel
- Bryan ChengBCBryan Cheng
Open Access
- 31 January 2024
- journal article
- research article
- Published by MDPI AG in International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
- Vol. 21 (2) , 166
Abstract
Refugees and migrants experience an elevated risk for mental health problems and face significant barriers to receiving services. Interpersonal counseling (IPC-3) is a three-session intervention that can be delivered by non-specialists to provide psychological support and facilitate referrals for individuals in need of specialized care. We piloted IPC-3 delivered remotely by eight Venezuelan refugee and migrant women living in Peru. These counselors provided IPC-3 to Venezuelan refugee and migrant clients in Peru (n = 32) who reported psychological distress. Clients completed assessments of mental health symptoms at baseline and one-month post-intervention. A subset of clients (n = 15) and providers (n = 8) completed post-implementation qualitative interviews. Results showed that IPC-3 filled a gap in the system of mental health care for refugees and migrants in Peru. Some adaptations were made to IPC-3 to promote its relevance to the population and context. Non-specialist providers developed the skills and confidence to provide IPC-3 competently. Clients displayed large reductions in symptoms of depression (d = 1.1), anxiety (d = 1.4), post-traumatic stress (d = 1.0), and functional impairment (d = 0.8). Remote delivery of IPC-3 by non-specialists appears to be a feasible, acceptable, and appropriate strategy to address gaps and improve efficiency within the mental health system and warrants testing in a fully powered effectiveness study.Keywords
Funding Information
- National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (UL1TR001873, K01MH129572)
- National Institute of Mental Health (UL1TR001873, K01MH129572)
This publication has 54 references indexed in Scilit:
- Interpersonal Psychotherapy: Evaluation, Support, TriageClinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 2012
- The Columbia–Suicide Severity Rating Scale: Initial Validity and Internal Consistency Findings From Three Multisite Studies With Adolescents and AdultsAmerican Journal of Psychiatry, 2011
- Synthesis of the psychometric properties of the PTSD checklist (PCL) military, civilian, and specific versionsDepression and Anxiety, 2011
- Interpersonal Psychotherapy for Depression: A Meta-AnalysisAmerican Journal of Psychiatry, 2011
- Group Interpersonal Psychotherapy for Depressed Youth in IDP Camps in Northern Uganda: Adaptation and TrainingChild and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 2008
- Interventions for Depression Symptoms Among Adolescent Survivors of War and Displacement in Northern UgandaJAMA, 2007
- A Brief Measure for Assessing Generalized Anxiety DisorderArchives of internal medicine (1960), 2006
- The PHQ-9Journal of General Internal Medicine, 2001
- Validation and Utility of a Self-report Version of PRIME-MDThe PHQ Primary Care StudyJAMA, 1999
- Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: the RE-AIM framework.American Journal of Public Health, 1999