Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Azosemide after Intravenous and Oral Administration to Rats with Alloxan-induced Diabetes Mellitus
Authors:
- 1 October 1996
- journal article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology
- Vol. 48 (10) , 1093-1097
Abstract
Because physiological changes occurring in diabetes mellitus patients could alter the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the drugs used to treat the disease, the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of azosemide were investigated after intravenous and oral administration of the drug (10 mg kg−1) to control and alloxan‐induced diabetes mellitus rats (AIDRs). After intravenous administration of azosemide to the AIDRs, the area under the plasma concentration‐time curve (AUC) increased considerably (3120 compared with 2520 μg min mL−1; P < 0.135) and the total body clearance decreased considerably (3.20 compared with 3.96 mL min−1 kg−1; P < 0.0593). The considerable reduction in time‐averaged total body clearance in the AIDRs was a result of the significant decrease in renal clearance (1.01 compared with 1.55 mL min−1 kg−1) in the AIDRs, the non‐renal clearance being comparable between the two groups of rats. After intravenous administration, the 8‐h urinary excretion of azosemide (29.5 compared with 40% of intravenous dose; P < 0.0883) and one of its metabolites, M1 (2.15 compared with 2.60% of intravenous dose, expressed in terms of azosemide; P < 0.05) decreased in the AIDRs because of the impaired kidney function. The diuretic, natriuretic, kaliuretic and chloruretic efficiencies increased significantly in the AIDRs. After oral administration of azosemide, AUC decreased significantly in the AIDRs (115 compared with 215 μg min mL−1) possibly because of the reduced gastrointestinal absorption of azosemide in the AIDRs. After oral administration of azosemide, the 8‐h urine output decreased significantly in the AIDRs (9.32 compared with 16.1 mL per 100 g body weight) because of the significantly reduced 8‐h urinary excretion of azosemide (3.00 compared with 9.14% of oral dose). After both intravenous and oral administration some pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters of azosemide were significantly different in AIDRs.Keywords
Funding Information
- Research Center for New Drug Development ((KOSEF-RCNDD))
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Determination of azosemide and its metabolite in plasma, blood, urine and tissue homogenates by high-performance liquid chromatographyJournal of Chromatography B: Biomedical Sciences and Applications, 1994
- Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of bumetanide after intravenous and oral administration to rats: Absorption from various GI segmentsJournal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics, 1994
- Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of furosemide in protein-calorie malnutritionJournal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics, 1993
- The Effects of Diabetes Mellitus on Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics in HumansClinical Pharmacokinetics, 1991
- Disposition of Azosemide. I. Distribution, Metabolism and Excretion Following Intravenous Administration to RatsYAKUGAKU ZASSHI, 1984
- Pharmacokinetics1982
- Effects in normal subjects of long‐term administration of azosemideClinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 1979
- New Calculation Method for Mean Apparent Drug Volume of Distribution and Application to Rational Dosage RegimensJournal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 1979
- Azosemide, a “loop” diuretic, and furosemideClinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 1979
- Critical evaluation of the potential error in pharmacokinetic studies of using the linear trapezoidal rule method for the calculation of the area under the plasma level-time curveJournal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics, 1978