Does Neuroplasticity Support the Hypothesis of Multiple Realizability?
Open Access
- 31 January 2022
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Philosophy of Science
- Vol. 89 (1) , 107-127
Abstract
It is commonly maintained that neuroplastic mechanisms in the brain provide empirical support for the hypothesis of multiple realizability. We show in various case studies that neuroplasticity stems from preexisting mechanisms and processes inherent in the neural (or biochemical) structure of the brain. We argue that not only does neuroplasticity fail to provide empirical evidence of multiple realization, its inability to do so strengthens the mind-body identity theory. Finally, we argue that a recently proposed identity theory called Flat Physicalism can be enlisted to explain the current state of the mind-body problem more adequately.Keywords
This publication has 47 references indexed in Scilit:
- What Is the Nature of Poststroke Language Recovery and Reorganization?ISRN Neurology, 2012
- ‘Visual’ Acuity of the Congenitally Blind Using Visual-to-Auditory Sensory SubstitutionPLOS ONE, 2012
- Mechanisms of aphasia recovery after stroke and the role of noninvasive brain stimulationBrain and Language, 2011
- Neural Correlates of Natural Human Echolocation in Early and Late Blind Echolocation ExpertsPLOS ONE, 2011
- Neuroscience and the Multiple Realization of Cognitive FunctionsPhilosophy of Science, 2010
- How to Test for Multiple RealizationPhilosophy of Science, 2008
- Direct Demonstration of Transcallosal Disinhibition in Language NetworksJournal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism, 2006
- The Occipital Cortex in the BlindCurrent Directions in Psychological Science, 2005
- Species-specific properties and more narrow reductive strategiesErkenntnis, 1993
- AphasiaNew England Journal of Medicine, 1992