Recognition of Morphometric Vertebral Fractures by Artificial Neural Networks: Analysis from GISMO Lombardia Database
Open Access
- 4 November 2011
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS ONE
- Vol. 6 (11) , e27277
Abstract
It is known that bone mineral density (BMD) predicts the fracture's risk only partially and the severity and number of vertebral fractures are predictive of subsequent osteoporotic fractures (OF). Spinal deformity index (SDI) integrates the severity and number of morphometric vertebral fractures. Nowadays, there is interest in developing algorithms that use traditional statistics for predicting OF. Some studies suggest their poor sensitivity. Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs) could represent an alternative. So far, no study investigated ANNs ability in predicting OF and SDI. The aim of the present study is to compare ANNs and Logistic Regression (LR) in recognising, on the basis of osteoporotic risk-factors and other clinical information, patients with SDI≥1 and SDI≥5 from those with SDI = 0. We compared ANNs prognostic performance with that of LR in identifying SDI≥1/SDI≥5 in 372 women with postmenopausal-osteoporosis (SDI≥1, n = 176; SDI = 0, n = 196; SDI≥5, n = 51), using 45 variables (44 clinical parameters plus BMD). ANNs were allowed to choose relevant input data automatically (TWIST-system-Semeion). Among 45 variables, 17 and 25 were selected by TWIST-system-Semeion, in SDI≥1 vs SDI = 0 (first) and SDI≥5 vs SDI = 0 (second) analysis. In the first analysis sensitivity of LR and ANNs was 35.8% and 72.5%, specificity 76.5% and 78.5% and accuracy 56.2% and 75.5%, respectively. In the second analysis, sensitivity of LR and ANNs was 37.3% and 74.8%, specificity 90.3% and 87.8%, and accuracy 63.8% and 81.3%, respectively. ANNs showed a better performance in identifying both SDI≥1 and SDI≥5, with a higher sensitivity, suggesting its promising role in the development of algorithm for predicting OF.Keywords
This publication has 46 references indexed in Scilit:
- Reproducibility of a semi-automatic method for 6-point vertebral morphometry in a multi-centre trialEuropean Journal of Radiology, 2009
- FRAX™ and the assessment of fracture probability in men and women from the UKOsteoporosis International, 2008
- Influence of baseline deformity definition on subsequent vertebral fracture risk in postmenopausal womenOsteoporosis International, 2006
- An optimized experimental protocol based on neuro-evolutionary algorithmsArtificial Intelligence in Medicine, 2005
- Comparison of logistic regression and neural network analysis applied to predicting living setting after hip fractureAnnals of Epidemiology, 2004
- Severity of prevalent vertebral fractures and the risk of subsequent vertebral and nonvertebral fractures: results from the MORE trialBone, 2003
- Effect of pravastatin on frequency of fracture in the LIPID study: secondly analysis of a randomised controlled trialThe Lancet, 2001
- Recognition of Vertebral Fracture in a Clinical SettingOsteoporosis International, 2000
- Approximate Statistical Tests for Comparing Supervised Classification Learning AlgorithmsNeural Computation, 1998
- A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases.Radiology, 1983