Basal Archosaurs: Phylogenetic Relationships and Functional Implications
Author:
- 31 December 1991
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology
- Vol. 11 (sup004) , 1-53
Abstract
Archosaurs first appeared in the Middle Triassic and within a short interval of time came to dominate all faunas of large vertebrates for the remainder of the Mesozoic. It is widely held that shortly after archosaurs first appeared the group split into two clades, now termed “Pseudosuchia” and “Ornithosuchia.” Each clade independently evolved a rotary-style ankle design (“crocodile-normal” and “crocodile-reversed,” respectively) and each independently evolved from semi-erect to erect limb posture. Erect posture, in turn, has been identified as the key adaptation (possibly associated with locomotor stamina) that resulted in the archosaurian radiation. These hypotheses are examined in light of a numerical cladistic analysis of basal archosaurs. Contrary to previous schemes, Archosauria is divided into Crurotarsi and Ornithodira. Crurotarsi (Suchia + Ornithosuchidae + Parasuchia) is characterized by the rotary crurotarsal ankle joint and other postcranial synapomorphies; this style of ankle joint thus appears to have evolved once rather than twice. Ornithodira is divided into Pterosauria and Dinosauromorpha. Pterosaurs, therefore, occupy a basal position within Ornithodira and do not constitute the sister-group to Dinosauria as has been suggested. The supposed pterosaur precursor, Scleromochlus, is reexamined and its proximity to Pterosauria is questioned. The analysis underscores the perils of employing functional constructs, such as ankle “types,” rather than character data in phylogeny reconstruction. Current scenarios for the evolution of upright posture in archosaurs—either as an “improvement” in design or as a correlate of locomotor stamina—are not supported by the cladistic pattern. Erect archosaurs coexisted for millions of years alongside more abundant sprawling or semi-erect rhynchosaurs and synapsids and radiated only after their demise. Osteological features associated with locomotor stamina in living tetrapods do not appear to be strongly correlated with erect posture among archosaurs. Once erect posture had been achieved in archosaurs, however, it may have promoted the evolution of bipedal locomotion, which appears at about the same time. Bipedal locomotion, in turn, may have permitted more extensive modification of the forelimbs, which in a short interval of time were fashioned as wing supports for powered flight in pterosaurs.Keywords
This publication has 45 references indexed in Scilit:
- Psittacosaurus xinjiangensis(Ornithischia: Ceratopsia), a new psittacosaur from the Lower Cretaceous of northwestern ChinaJournal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 1988
- On the cervical vertebrae of the Pterodactyloidea (Reptilia: Archosauria)Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 1986
- Classification and phylogeny of the diapsid reptilesZoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 1985
- Significance of ankle structures in archosaur phylogenyNature, 1982
- Classification of the thecodontiaGeobios, 1982
- The hind limb step cycle of Caiman sclerops and the mechanics of the crocodile tarsus and metatarsusCanadian Journal of Zoology, 1980
- Dinosaur Monophyly and a New Class of VertebratesNature, 1974
- The classification of the ProterosuchiaBiological Journal of the Linnean Society, 1970
- The head Skeleton of the LizardActa Zoologica, 1960
- A Sketch Classification of the Pre‐Junissic Tetrapod VertebratesJournal of Zoology, 1917