Lack of evidence that concurrent sensory product characterisation using CATA questions bias hedonic scores
Authors:
- Sara R. JaegerSJSara R. Jaeger
- Gastón AresGAGastón Ares
- 1 July 2014
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in Food Quality and Preference
- Vol. 35, 1-5
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Visual attention by consumers to check-all-that-apply questions: Insights to support methodological developmentFood Quality and Preference, 2014
- Investigation of the number of consumers necessary to obtain stable sample and descriptor configurations from check-all-that-apply (CATA) questionsFood Quality and Preference, 2014
- CATA questions for sensory product characterization: Raising awareness of biasesFood Quality and Preference, 2013
- Investigation of bias of hedonic scores when co-eliciting product attribute information using CATA questionsFood Quality and Preference, 2013
- Check-all-that-apply (CATA) responses elicited by consumers: Within-assessor reproducibility and stability of sensory product characterizationsFood Quality and Preference, 2013
- Check-all-that-apply questions: Influence of attribute order on sensory product characterizationFood Quality and Preference, 2013
- Analysis and Thurstonian Scaling of Applicability ScoresJournal of Sensory Studies, 2013
- QUESTIONNAIRE PRACTICE: WHAT HAPPENS WHEN THE JAR SCALE IS PLACED BETWEEN TWO “OVERALL” ACCEPTANCE SCALES?Journal of Sensory Studies, 2008
- EFFECT OF QUESTION ORDER ON SENSORY PERCEPTION AND PREFERENCE IN CENTRAL LOCATION TRIALSJournal of Sensory Studies, 1997
- Response strategies for coping with the cognitive demands of attitude measures in surveysApplied Cognitive Psychology, 1991