Imaging techniques for cardiac strain and deformation: comparison of echocardiography, cardiac magnetic resonance and cardiac computed tomography
- 1 February 2013
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy
- Vol. 11 (2) , 221-231
Abstract
Myocardial function assessment is essential for determining the health of the myocardium. Global assessment of myocardial function is widely performed (by estimating the ejection fraction), but many common cardiac diseases initially affect the myocardium on a regional, rather than global basis. Regional myocardial wall motion can be quantified using myocardial strain analysis (a normalized measure of deformation). Myocardial strain can be measured in terms of three normal strains (longitudinal strain, radial strain and circumferential) and six shear strains. Cardiac MRI (cMRI) is usually considered the reference standard for measurement of myocardial strain. The most common cMRI method, termed tagged cMRI, allows full, 3D assessment of regional strain. However, due to its complexity and lengthy times for analysis, tagged cMRI is not usually used outside of academic centers. Tagged cMRI is also primarily used only in research studies. Echocardiography combined with tissue Doppler imaging or a speckle tracking technique is now widely available in the clinical setting. Myocardial strain measurement by echocardiography shows reasonable agreement with cMRI. Limited standardization and differences between vendors represent current limitations of the technique. Cardiac computed tomography (CCT) is the newest and most rapidly growing modality for noninvasive imaging of the heart. While CCT studies are most commonly applied to assess the coronary arteries, CCT is easily adapted to provide functional information for both the left and right ventricles. New methods for CCT assessment of regional myocardial function are being developed. This review outlines the current literature on imaging techniques related to cardiac strain analysis and discusses the strengths and weaknesses of various methods for myocardial strain analysis.Keywords
This publication has 73 references indexed in Scilit:
- Quantification of biventricular myocardial function using cardiac magnetic resonance feature tracking, endocardial border delineation and echocardiographic speckle tracking in patients with repaired tetralogy of fallot and healthy controlsJournal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, 2012
- In search of new therapeutic targets and strategies for heart failure: recent advances in basic scienceThe Lancet, 2011
- A coupled deformable model for tracking myocardial borders from real-time echocardiography using an incompressibility constraintMedical Image Analysis, 2010
- Myocardial tissue tagging with cardiovascular magnetic resonanceJournal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, 2009
- The “Post-64” Era of Coronary CT Angiography: Understanding New Technology from Physical PrinciplesRadiologic Clinics of North America, 2009
- Use of myocardial strain to assess global left ventricular function: A comparison with cardiac magnetic resonance and 3-dimensional echocardiographyAmerican Heart Journal, 2009
- Quantitative Analysis of Intraventricular Dyssynchrony Using Wall Thickness by Multidetector Computed TomographyJACC: Cardiovascular Imaging, 2008
- Tissue Doppler and strain imaging: anything left in the echo-lab?Cardiovascular Ultrasound, 2008
- Imaging techniques in cardiac resynchronization therapyThe International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging, 2007
- Estimation of 3-D left ventricular deformation from medical images using biomechanical modelsIEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 2002