Adverse reaction to metal debris after small-head diameter metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty: an increasing concern
Authors:
- 1 November 2018
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in HIP International
- Vol. 28 (2_suppl) , 35-42
Abstract
Introduction: Failures due to adverse reaction to metal debris (ARMD) have become an area of common focus among surgeons performing hip replacements. Several authors have reported data on the prevalence of these masses, in both symptomatic and asymptomatic patients after either large-diameter head metal-on-metal (MoM) total hip arthroplasty (THA) or hip resurfacing arthroplasty, with a large variability of rate. To our knowledge, few data are reported on the association of this lesion with the use of small-head diameter MoM. Methods: 15 hips that were revised for ARMD in small-head MoM THA were included in this study. We focused our attention on the difficulties of diagnosis and treatment and also on the histologic aspects of the harvested pathologic tissue. Results: The histological examination of our cases showed a presence of lymphocytic infiltrate suggesting a delayed hypersensitivity reaction to the metal of type IV (ALVAL), but different from each other in term of the prevalence of the cellular component. Osteolysis and severe soft tissue damage were also observed. Revision resulted in remission of the lesion and successful implant. Conclusions: Our observation suggests that the evidence of ARMD should be considered even in case of small-head MoM arthroplasty and therefore these patients should be followed scrupulously with 2nd level diagnostic tools such as magnetic resonance imaging with metal artifact reduction sequence (MARS-MRI) and metal ion levels at least once. Further investigations are necessary to establish the real prevalence of this phenomenon in the whole population of small-head MoM THAs.Keywords
This publication has 37 references indexed in Scilit:
- Metal Ion Concentrations in Body Fluids after Implantation of Hip Replacements with Metal-on-Metal Bearing – Systematic Review of Clinical and Epidemiological StudiesPLOS ONE, 2013
- Consensus Statement “Current Evidence on the Management of Metal-on-Metal Bearings”: April 16, 2012HIP International, 2013
- Adverse reactions to metal debris: histopathological features of periprosthetic soft tissue reactions seen in association with failed metal on metal hip arthroplastiesJournal of Clinical Pathology, 2012
- Surgical Variables Influence Metal Ion Levels After Hip ResurfacingClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 2011
- Histological Features of Pseudotumor-like Tissues From Metal-on-Metal HipsClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 2010
- Necrotic granulomatous pseudotumours in bilateral resurfacing hip arthoplasties: evidence for a type IV immune responseVirchows Archiv, 2008
- THA Using Metal-on-Metal Articulation in Active Patients Younger Than 50 YearsClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 2008
- Orthopaedic metals and their potential toxicity in the arthroplasty patientThe Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume, 2007
- Proposal for a histopathological consensus classification of the periprosthetic interface membraneJournal of Clinical Pathology, 2006
- Treatment of the young active patient with osteoarthritis of the hipThe Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume, 2006