Endoscopy After Acute Myocardial Infarction
Authors:
- William J. CobellWCWilliam J. Cobell
- Shoba TheivanayagamSTShoba Theivanayagam
- Todd W. KilgoreTKTodd W. Kilgore
- Michelle L. MattesonMMMichelle L. Matteson
- Srinivas R. PuliSPSrinivas R. Puli
- Matthew L. BechtoldMBMatthew L. Bechtold
- MdMDMd
- Ph DPDPh D
- FacgFAFacg
- 1 October 2013
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Southern Medical Association in Southern Medical Journal
- Vol. 106 (10) , 545-549
Abstract
Upper gastrointestinal bleeding in the setting of acute myocardial infarction (MI) has substantial morbidity and mortality. Several studies have been performed on the safety of esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) after MI; however, these studies vary in definitions and results. We evaluated the safety and effect of EGD in patients with acute MI in a tertiary center. A retrospective, single tertiary-care center study was undertaken of 87 patients who underwent EGD within 30 days of an acute MI between January 2001 and March 2012. Type of MI (ST segment elevation MI [STEMI] and non-ST segment elevation MI [NSTEMI]), peak troponin I, time from MI to EGD, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score at EGD, cardiac catheterization before EGD, and medical complications within 24 hours of EGD were noted. Medical complications were defined as major complications (death, life-threatening arrhythmias) and minor complications (chest pain, abnormal vital signs, or minor arrhythmias). Eighty-seven patients underwent EGD within 30 days of having an MI. No major complications were observed. Minor complications occurred in 27 of 87 patients (31.0%), including mild hypotension, mild bradycardia, or increased chest pain. Patients with STEMI demonstrated statistically significant quicker endoscopy (P = 0.01) and were more likely to undergo cardiac catheterization in advance of EGD (P < 0.01) than those with NSTEMI. No statistically significant differences were noted for peak troponin I (P = 0.21), APACHE II score at EGD (P = 0.55), or minor complications (P = 0.08) among patients with STEMI versus NSTEMI. Cardiac catheterization before EGD did not seem to affect results. Patients with APACHE II scores >16 experienced more minor complications (P = 0.02). EGD appears relatively safe for the diagnosis and management of upper gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with acute MI.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Safety of Esophagogastroduodenoscopy within 30 Days of Myocardial Infarction: A Retrospective Cohort Study from a Canadian Tertiary CentreCanadian Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 2012
- Problems With Combining Together EGD, PEG, Flexible Sigmoidoscopy, and Colonoscopy to Analyze Risks of Endoscopic Procedures After MI: A Call for Stratifying Risk According to Individual Endoscopic ProceduresJournal of Clinical Gastroenterology, 2009
- Upper Endoscopy in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction and Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: Results of a Decision AnalysisDigestive Diseases and Sciences, 2008
- Autonomic nervous function in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: A prospective randomized comparison between transnasal and oral proceduresJournal of Gastroenterology, 2008
- Safety and utility of oesophago-gastro-duodenoscopy in acute myocardial infarctionEuropean Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, 2008
- A national study of cardiopulmonary unplanned events after GI endoscopyGastrointestinal Endoscopy, 2007
- The Utility of Upper Endoscopy in Patients with Concomitant Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding and Acute Myocardial InfarctionDigestive Diseases and Sciences, 2006
- Changes in Cardiopulmonary Parameters During Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy in Patients with Heart Disease: Towards Safer EndoscopyEndoscopy, 2000
- Safety and efficacy of esophagogastroduodenoscopy after myocardial infarctionThe American Journal of Medicine, 1999
- APACHE IICritical Care Medicine, 1985