Clinician Racial Biases: Preliminary Investigation on Predictors of Poor Therapeutic Alliance and Retention in Home Visiting Intervention Program
Authors:
- Chioma TorresCTChioma Torres
- Katherine L. RosenblumKRKatherine L. Rosenblum
- Jennifer M. JesterJJJennifer M. Jester
- Megan M. JulianMJMegan M. Julian
- Larissa N. NiecLarissa N. Niec
- Maria MuzikMMMaria Muzik
- Michigan Collaborative for Infant Mental Health ResearchMRMichigan Collaborative for Infant Mental Health Research
- 2 February 2022
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Maternal and Child Health Journal
- Vol. 26 (4) , 953-961
Abstract
Background Home visiting programs are effective in improving maternal-child health, and higher therapeutic alliance is associated with improved program retention and outcomes. Black, single, low-income mothers have a higher risk for poorer health outcomes in pregnancy and postpartum and for early termination of therapeutic services. Objective To examine associations between clinician and client alliance and social, economic, and racial demographics. Methods Mothers (N = 71) who were pregnant or had an infant (age < 24 m) receiving Infant Mental Health (IMH) services through community health service agencies and their clinicians (N = 50) completed the Scale to Assess Therapeutic Relationships (clinicians: STAR-C, clients: STAR-P) at 3-, 6-, 9-, and 12 months, and provided demographic information. Results Survival analysis showed those with higher alliance ratings, both client and clinician ratings, at the 3-month time-point were more likely to remain in treatment longer (for clients est = -1.67, p = .0017; for clinician est = -.75, p = .031). Controlling for clinician experience and frequency of reflective supervision, Black clinicians had higher alliance ratings than white clinicians, (b = 3.1 (1.6), p = .049). Neither clinician-client racial match nor client marital status predicted alliance. Black clinicians’ ratings of alliance did not vary by client race, but white clinicians reported weaker alliance with their Black, relative to white, clients (β = .40, p = .045). Conclusions Weaker alliance reported by white clinicians with Black clients, coupled with a lack of client-race related differences for Black clinicians, suggests white clinician racial bias may be important to consider in regards to program retention and health disparities.Keywords
Funding Information
- National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (T32HD079350-02)
- Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services
- Ethel and James Flinn Foundation
- Michigan Department of Health and Human Services
This publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- Effectiveness of home visiting programs on child outcomes: a systematic reviewBMC Public Health, 2013
- The Importance of Therapist/Client Ethnic/Racial Matching in Couples Treatment for Domestic ViolenceContemporary Family Therapy, 2012
- The Elephant Is Not Pink: Talking About White, Black, and Brown to Achieve Excellence in Clinical PracticeClinical Social Work Journal, 2011
- Does the Therapeutic Relationship Predict Outcomes of Psychiatric Treatment in Patients with Psychosis? A Systematic ReviewPsychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 2010
- Predicting Child Abuse Potential: An Empirical Investigation of Two Theoretical FrameworksJournal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 2010
- Who Drops Out of Early Head Start Home Visiting Programs?Early Education and Development, 2008
- When more is not better: the role of cumulative risk in child behavior outcomesJournal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 2004
- Does home visiting improve parenting and the quality of the home environment? A systematic review and meta analysisArchives of Disease in Childhood, 2000
- Relation of the therapeutic alliance with outcome and other variables: A meta-analytic review.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 2000
- Relation of the therapeutic alliance with outcome and other variables: A meta-analytic review.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 2000