The representation of winter Northern Hemisphere atmospheric blocking in ECMWF seasonal prediction systems
Open Access
- 17 January 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society
- Vol. 147 (735) , 1344-1363
Abstract
The simulation and prediction of winter Northern Hemisphere atmospheric blocking in the seasonal prediction systems from the European Centre for Medium‐Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) is analysed. Blocking statistics from the operational November‐initialised seasonal hindcasts are evaluated in three generations of models: System3, System4, and System5 (SEAS5). Improvements in the climatological representation of blocking are observed in the most recent model configurations, with reduced bias over North Pacific and Greenland. Minor progress is seen over the European sector, where SEAS5 still underestimates the observed blocking frequency. SEAS5 blocking interannual variability is underestimated too and is proportional to the climatological frequency, highlighting that a negative bias in the blocking frequency implies an underestimation of the interannual variance. SEAS5 predictive skill and signal‐to‐noise ratio remain low, but interesting positive results are found over Western and Central Europe. Improved forecasts with reduced ensemble spread are obtained during El Niño years, especially at low latitudes. Complementary experiments show that the statistics of blocking are improved following atmospheric and oceanic resolution increase. Conversely, they remain largely insensitive to coupled model sea‐surface temperature (SST) errors. On the other hand, the implementation of stochastic parameterisations tends to displace blocking activity equatorward. Finally, by comparing seasonal hindcasts with climate runs using the same model, we highlight that the largest contributors to the chronic underestimation of blocking are persistent errors in the atmospheric model. It is also shown that SST errors have a larger impact on blocking bias in climate runs than in seasonal runs, and that increased ocean model resolution contributes to improved blocking more effectively in climate runs. Seasonal forecasts can thus be considered a suitable test‐bed for model development targeting blocking improvement in climate models.Keywords
This publication has 44 references indexed in Scilit:
- Winter and Summer Northern Hemisphere Blocking in CMIP5 ModelsJournal of Climate, 2013
- Quantifying the relevance of atmospheric blocking for co‐located temperature extremes in the Northern Hemisphere on (sub‐)daily time scalesGeophysical Research Letters, 2012
- Extreme Cold Winter Temperatures in Europe under the Influence of North Atlantic Atmospheric BlockingJournal of Climate, 2011
- The 2010 Crafoord Prize awarded to Walter MunkTellus, 2011
- Effect of the climate shift around mid 1970s on the relationship between wintertime Ural blocking circulation and East Asian climateInternational Journal of Climatology, 2009
- The Morphology of Northern Hemisphere BlockingJournal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 2008
- Blocking and Rossby Wave Breaking on the Dynamical Tropopause in the Southern HemisphereJournal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 2007
- A Climatology of Northern Hemisphere BlockingJournal of Climate, 2006
- Global analyses of sea surface temperature, sea ice, and night marine air temperature since the late nineteenth centuryJournal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 2003
- Stochastic representation of model uncertainties in the ECMWF ensemble prediction systemQuarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 1999