Adverse Section 404 Opinions and Shareholder Dissatisfaction toward Auditors
Authors:
- Dana R. HermansonDHDana R. Hermanson
- Jagan KrishnanJKJagan Krishnan
- Zhongxia (Shelly) YeZYZhongxia (Shelly) Ye
- 1 December 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Accounting Association in Accounting Horizons
- Vol. 23 (4) , 391-409
Abstract
SYNOPSIS: Auditors issuing adverse Section 404 internal control opinions may be viewed as too conservative, or they may be blamed for being partly responsible for the existence of the internal control material weaknesses. Using a sample of 240 companies with adverse internal control opinions and 240 matched “clean” companies in their first year of Section 404 compliance, we examine how shareholder dissatisfaction with the auditors varies depending on material weakness existence/type (company-level versus noncompany-level) and the presence of recent accounting restatements. In the full sample, we find a significant positive interaction between restatement and company-level material weakness—company-level material weaknesses have a greater effect on shareholder dissatisfaction when a restatement has occurred. To provide insight, we partition our sample based on whether test companies have had recent accounting restatements. In the nonrestatement sample, we find that shareholders are less likely to vote for auditor ratification if the company received an adverse Section 404 internal control opinion because of noncompany-level material weaknesses. Shareholders may view the auditor as being too conservative when no company-level material weaknesses are cited and no recent accounting restatements have been issued. In the restatement sample, we find that shareholders are less likely to vote for auditor ratification if the company received an adverse Section 404 opinion with or without company-level material weaknesses cited—but with shareholder dissatisfaction greater for companies with company-level material weaknesses. Hence, in companies with recent accounting restatements, shareholders may blame the auditor for being partly responsible for the existence of material weaknesses (i.e., low audit quality). Overall, the results provide insights into shareholders’ perceptions of auditing and suggest that existing shareholders may sometimes prefer less conservative auditors. We encourage additional research on the role of auditors in protecting current versus prospective shareholders.Keywords
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- Electing DirectorsThe Journal of Finance, 2009
- The Effect of SOX Internal Control Deficiencies on Firm Risk and Cost of EquityJournal of Accounting Research, 2009
- Internal Control Weaknesses and Information UncertaintyThe Accounting Review, 2008
- Why do corporate managers misstate financial statements? The role of option compensation and other factorsJournal of Financial Economics, 2007
- The Wealth Change and Redistribution Effects of Sarbanes-Oxley Internal Control DisclosuresSSRN Electronic Journal, 2005
- Consequences of Financial Reporting Failure for Outside Directors: Evidence from Accounting Restatements and Audit Committee MembersJournal of Accounting Research, 2005
- The Impact of the Institutional and Regulatory Environment on Shareholder VotingFinancial Management, 2002
- The Auditor's Going‐Concern Disclosure as a Self‐Fulfilling Prophecy: A Discrete‐Time Survival Analysis*Decision Sciences, 1999
- Corporate governance and shareholder initiatives: Empirical evidenceJournal of Financial Economics, 1996
- A Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for HeteroskedasticityEconometrica, 1980