Nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus pembrolizumab as chemotherapy‐free, first‐line treatment for PD‐L1‐positive non‐small cell lung cancer
Open Access
- 1 March 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Clinical and Translational Medicine
- Vol. 10 (1) , 107-115
Abstract
Background: Nivolumab plus ipilimumab (N‐I) or pembrolizumab (PEM) is associated with survival improvement as chemotherapy‐free, first‐line treatment for patients with advanced non‐small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) and positive programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD‐L1). However, no direct comparison data exist between these two regimens to inform clinical decisions. Therefore, we performed indirect comparison for N‐I versus PEM using frequentist methods.Results: Three randomized trials (KEYNOTE‐024, KEYNOTE‐042, and CheckMate 227) involving 2372 patients were included. For patients with tumor PD‐L1 level of ≥1%, pooled meta‐analyses showed that both N‐I and PEM improved overall survival (OS) relative to chemotherapy (N‐I: hazard ratio [HR] 0.82, 95% CI 0.69‐0.97; PEM: HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.71‐0.93); whereas only N‐I significantly improved progression‐free survival (PFS) (N‐I: HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.65‐0.96; PEM: HR 1.07, 95% CI 0.94‐1.21). Neither N‐I nor PEM was associated with improved objective response rate (ORR) compared with chemotherapy (N‐I: relative risk [RR] 1.20, 95% CI 0.98‐1.46; PEM: RR 1.03, 95% CI 0.86‐1.23). Indirect comparisons showed that N‐I was associated with longer PFS than PEM (HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.62‐0.95). However, N‐I was not superior to PEM in terms of OS (HR 0.98, 95% CI 0.77‐1.24) and ORR (RR 1.17, 95% CI 0.89‐1.52). N‐I showed a less favorable toxicity profile relative to PEM (all grade adverse events: RR 1.28, 95% CI 1.17‐1.40).Conclusions: N‐I and PEM provide comparable OS benefit for PD‐L1‐positive NSCLC. N‐I further improves PFS relative to PEM but at meaningful cost of toxicities.Keywords
Funding Information
- National Key R&D Program of China (2016YFC0905500, 2016YFC0905503)
- National Natural Science Funds of China (81903176, 81972898, 81602005, 81702283, 81872499, 81602011)
- Outstanding Young Talents Program of Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center (16zxyc04)
- Central Basic Scientific Research Fund for Colleges-Young Teacher Training Program of Sun Yat-sen University (17ykpy81)
- Science and Technology Program of Guangdong Province (2019A1515011596, 2017B020227001)
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Nivolumab plus Ipilimumab in Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 2019
- Five-Year Survival with Combined Nivolumab and Ipilimumab in Advanced MelanomaNew England Journal of Medicine, 2019
- Pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy for previously untreated, PD-L1-expressing, locally advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (KEYNOTE-042): a randomised, open-label, controlled, phase 3 trialThe Lancet, 2019
- Nivolumab plus Ipilimumab versus Sunitinib in Advanced Renal-Cell CarcinomaNew England Journal of Medicine, 2018
- First-Line Nivolumab in Stage IV or Recurrent Non–Small-Cell Lung CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 2017
- Pembrolizumab versus Chemotherapy for PD-L1–Positive Non–Small-Cell Lung CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 2016
- A rheostat for immune responses: the unique properties of PD-1 and their advantages for clinical applicationNature Immunology, 2013
- Validity of indirect comparison for estimating efficacy of competing interventions: empirical evidence from published meta-analysesBMJ, 2003
- Comparison of Four Chemotherapy Regimens for Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 2002
- The results of direct and indirect treatment comparisons in meta-analysis of randomized controlled trialsJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1997