Trust in whom? Dioxin, organizations, risk perception, and fish consumption in Michigan’s Saginaw Bay watershed
- 11 October 2018
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Risk Research
- Vol. 22 (12) , 1624-1637
Abstract
Trust is generally recognized as important for risk-relevant behavior but research suggests that trust in different organizations may have varying effects. This research advances the literature by testing two hypotheses which postulate that this variability can be explained by risk perception. We collected data from 351 anglers regarding their trust in nine organizations whose efforts are relevant to dioxin contamination in Michigan’s Saginaw Bay Watershed, risk perceptions, and self-reports of risky behavior (i.e. consumption of local fish identified as especially likely to contain contaminants). As hypothesized (H1), the negative effect of trust in two agencies—the Michigan Department of Natural Resources (MDNR) and a Michigan Department of Health and Human Services-sponsored River Walker Program (RWP)—on risky behavior was significantly mediated by risk perception but these effects differed from each other such that trust in the MDNR was associated with increased perceptions of risk while trust in the RWP was associated with decreased perceptions of benefit. Also as hypothesized (H2), the positive effect of trust in Dow Chemical Company on risky behavior was significantly mediated by risk perception such that increased trust in Dow was associated with reduced risk perception. The current results lend credence to arguments regarding the importance of specificity in the target of trust and advance this literature by suggesting that differential effects on risk perception help explain this variability. Thus, organizations whose efforts focus on risk communication appear ideally situated to reduce risky behavior through a negative impact on risk perception. Other organizations, however, may run the risk of increasing risky behavior if their efforts result in reduced perceptions of risk.Keywords
Funding Information
- National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences
- Michigan Department of Health and Human Services
- Michigan Department of Environmental Quality
This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit:
- Far More than Market‐Based: Rethinking the Impact of the Dutch Viswijzer (Good Fish Guide) on Fisheries' GovernanceSociologia Ruralis, 2011
- Bioaccumulation of polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins, dibenzofurans, and dioxin-like polychlorinated biphenyls in fishes from the Tittabawassee and Saginaw Rivers, Michigan, USAScience of The Total Environment, 2010
- Dow Chemical's Knowledge Factories: Action Anthropology against Michigan's Company Town CultureAnthropology in Action, 2009
- Communicating Risks and Benefits from Fish Consumption: Impact on Belgian Consumers' Perception and Intention to Eat FishRisk Analysis, 2008
- Local Understanding of Fish Consumption Advisory Risks in Michigan's Upper Peninsula: The Role of Structure, Culture, and Agency*Rural Sociology, 2008
- Risk communication and natural hazard mitigation: how trust influences its effectivenessInternational Journal of Global Environmental Issues, 2008
- Deliberative Planning through Citizen Advisory BoardsJournal of Planning Education and Research, 2007
- Development of a Public Participation and Communication Protocol for Establishing Fish Consumption AdvisoriesRisk Analysis, 2003
- Trust And Social Representations Of The Management Of Threatened And Endangered SpeciesEnvironment and Behavior, 2003
- Risk and Recreancy: Weber, the Division of Labor, and the Rationality of Risk PerceptionsSocial Forces, 1993