Why do some hospitals achieve better care of severely malnourished children than others? Five-year follow-up of rural hospitals in Eastern Cape, South Africa
Authors:
Open Access
- 13 August 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Health Policy and Planning
- Vol. 23 (6) , 428-437
Abstract
Staff at 11 rural hospitals in an under-resourced region of Eastern Cape Province, South Africa, participated in an intervention to improve the quality of care of severely malnourished children through training and support aimed at implementing the WHO case-management guidelines. Despite similar intervention inputs, some hospitals reduced their case-fatality rates by at least half, whereas others did not. The aim of this study was to investigate reasons for this disparity. Two successful and two poorly performing hospitals were purposively selected based on their case-fatality rates, which were 30% in those performing poorly. Comparative data were collected during June to October 2004 through structured observations of ward procedures, compilation of hospital data on case-loads and resources, and staff interviews and discussions related to attitudes, teamwork, training, supervision, managerial support and leadership. The four study hospitals had broadly similar resources, infrastructure and child:nurse ratios, and all had made changes to their clinical and dietary management following training. Case-management was broadly in line with WHO guidelines but the study revealed clear differences in institutional culture which influenced quality of care. Staff in the successful hospitals were more attentive and assiduous than staff in the poorly performing hospitals, especially in relation to rehydration procedures, feeding and the recording of vital signs. There was a strong emphasis on in-service training and induction of incoming staff in the successful hospitals and better supervision of junior staff and carers. Nurses had more positive attitudes towards malnourished children and their carers, and were less judgmental. Underlying factors were differences in leadership, teamwork, and managerial supervision and support. We conclude that unless there are supportive structures at managerial level, the potential benefits of efficacious interventions and related training programmes to improve health worker performance can be thwarted.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- How can we achieve and maintain high-quality performance of health workers in low-resource settings?The Lancet, 2005
- Clinical leadership in hospital care: The right kind of clinical leadership is neededBMJ, 2005
- Clinical leadership in the provision of hospital careBMJ, 2005
- Diffusion of Innovations in Service Organizations: Systematic Review and RecommendationsThe Milbank Quarterly, 2004
- Applying the right standards to improve hospital performance in AfricaThe Lancet, 2004
- WHO guidelines for management of severe malnutrition in rural South African hospitals: effect on case fatality and the influence of operational factorsThe Lancet, 2004
- Improving the hospital management of malnourished children by participatory researchInternational Journal for Quality in Health Care, 2004
- Quality of hospital care for seriously ill children in less-developed countriesThe Lancet, 2001
- Brief report. Reduction in in-hospital mortality of children with malnutritionJournal of Tropical Pediatrics, 1996
- Words Without Action? The Production, Dissemination, and Impact of Consensus RecommendationsAnnual Review of Public Health, 1991