Enlarging a training set for genomic selection by imputation of un-genotyped animals in populations of varying genetic architecture
Open Access
- 26 April 2013
- journal article
- Published by Springer Nature in Genetics Selection Evolution
- Vol. 45 (1) , 12
Abstract
Background: The most common application of imputation is to infer genotypes of a high-density panel of markers on animals that are genotyped for a low-density panel. However, the increase in accuracy of genomic predictions resulting from an increase in the number of markers tends to reach a plateau beyond a certain density. Another application of imputation is to increase the size of the training set with un-genotyped animals. This strategy can be particularly successful when a set of closely related individuals are genotyped. Methods: Imputation on completely un-genotyped dams was performed using known genotypes from the sire of each dam, one offspring and the offspring’s sire. Two methods were applied based on either allele or haplotype frequencies to infer genotypes at ambiguous loci. Results of these methods and of two available software packages were compared. Quality of imputation under different population structures was assessed. The impact of using imputed dams to enlarge training sets on the accuracy of genomic predictions was evaluated for different populations, heritabilities and sizes of training sets. Results: Imputation accuracy ranged from 0.52 to 0.93 depending on the population structure and the method used. The method that used allele frequencies performed better than the method based on haplotype frequencies. Accuracy of imputation was higher for populations with higher levels of linkage disequilibrium and with larger proportions of markers with more extreme allele frequencies. Inclusion of imputed dams in the training set increased the accuracy of genomic predictions. Gains in accuracy ranged from close to zero to 37.14%, depending on the simulated scenario. Generally, the larger the accuracy already obtained with the genotyped training set, the lower the increase in accuracy achieved by adding imputed dams. Conclusions: Whenever a reference population resembling the family configuration considered here is available, imputation can be used to achieve an extra increase in accuracy of genomic predictions by enlarging the training set with completely un-genotyped dams. This strategy was shown to be particularly useful for populations with lower levels of linkage disequilibrium, for genomic selection on traits with low heritability, and for species or breeds for which the size of the reference population is limited.Keywords
This publication has 35 references indexed in Scilit:
- A phasing and imputation method for pedigreed populations that results in a single-stage genomic evaluationGenetics Selection Evolution, 2012
- Using Whole-Genome Sequence Data to Predict Quantitative Trait Phenotypes in Drosophila melanogasterPLOS Genetics, 2012
- Genome-wide associations for fertility traits in Holstein–Friesian dairy cows using data from experimental research herds in four European countriesAnimal, 2012
- Genotype imputation for the prediction of genomic breeding values in non-genotyped and low-density genotyped individualsBMC Proceedings, 2011
- Accuracy of genotype imputation in sheep breedsAnimal Genetics, 2011
- Dimension reduction and variable selection for genomic selection: application to predicting milk yield in HolsteinsJournal of Animal Breeding and Genetics, 2011
- A combined long-range phasing and long haplotype imputation method to impute phase for SNP genotypesGenetics Selection Evolution, 2011
- Genomic evaluations with many more genotypesGenetics Selection Evolution, 2011
- A Unified Approach to Genotype Imputation and Haplotype-Phase Inference for Large Data Sets of Trios and Unrelated IndividualsThe American Journal of Human Genetics, 2009
- A Fast and Flexible Statistical Model for Large-Scale Population Genotype Data: Applications to Inferring Missing Genotypes and Haplotypic PhaseThe American Journal of Human Genetics, 2006