Differences in distortion product otoacoustic emission phase recorded from human neonates using two popular probes
- 24 June 2010
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Acoustical Society of America (ASA) in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
- Vol. 128 (1) , EL49-EL55
Abstract
DPOAE (2f1-f2) phase was measured across a 3-octave frequency range from two groups of newborns using ER10B+ and ER10C probe microphones. A marked phase shift was noted in the mid-to-high frequency range for newborn data recorded with the ER10C only. In contrast, the ER10B+ produced phase that was approximately invariant as a function of frequency for most of the range. Probe-related phase shifts can be effectively eliminated by correcting for variations in the phases of the primary tones. Results highlight the importance of detecting and correcting for system-related phase shifts so they are not misinterpreted as cochlear in origin.Keywords
Funding Information
- NIH (R01 DC003552)
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Distortion product otoacoustic emission phase and component analysis in human newbornsThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2010
- Measuring distortion product otoacoustic emissions using continuously sweeping primariesThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2008
- A comparative study of distortion-product-otoacoustic-emission fine structure in human newborns and adults with normal hearingThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2007
- Multiple internal reflections in the cochlea and their effect on DPOAE fine structureThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2002
- Wave and place fixed DPOAE maps of the human earThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2001
- Interrelations among distortion-product phase-gradient delays: Their connection to scaling symmetry and its breakingThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2000
- On the relationships between the fixed-f1, fixed-f2, and fixed-ratio phase derivatives of the 2f1–f2 distortion product otoacoustic emissionThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2000
- Evoked otoacoustic emissions arise by two fundamentally different mechanisms: A taxonomy for mammalian OAEsThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1999
- Experimental confirmation of the two-source interference model for the fine structure of distortion product otoacoustic emissionsThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1999
- Suppression of distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAE) near 2f1−f2 removes DP-gram fine structure—Evidence for a secondary generatorThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1998