Validation of the King’s Brief Interstitial Lung Disease questionnaire in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
Open Access
- 19 December 2019
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in BMC Pulmonary Medicine
- Vol. 19 (1) , 1-9
Abstract
Background: Health-related quality of life (HRQL) is impaired in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). The King’s Brief Interstitial Lung Disease questionnaire (K-BILD) is a validated measure of HRQL, but no previous studies have focused on the validity of K-BILD in IPF. Moreover, the relationship between K-BILD and dyspnoea or the 6-min walk test (6MWT) has not been assessed. The aim of this study was to validate K-BILD in the largest cohort of patients with IPF to date and assess how K-BILD correlates to dyspnoea and 6MWT. Methods: Firstly, K-BILD was translated into Danish using validated translation procedures. Consecutive patients with IPF were recruited. At baseline, patients completed K-BILD, the IPF-specific version of St. Georges Respiratory Questionnaire, University of California, San Diego Shortness of Breath Questionnaire (SOBQ) Short Form-36, and pulmonary function tests and 6MWT were performed. After 14 days, K-BILD and Global Rating of Change Scales were completed. Internal consistency, concurrent validity, test-retest reliability and known groups validity were assessed. Analyses were also performed in subgroups of patients with different time since diagnosis. Results: At baseline, 150 patients with IPF completed the questionnaires, and 139 patients completed the questionnaires after 14 days. K-BILD had a high internal consistency (Cronbach’s α = 0.92). The concurrent validity was strong compared to SOBQ (r = − 0.66) and moderate compared to 6MWT (r = 0.43). Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC = 0.91) and a Bland Altman plot demonstrated a good reliability. K-BILD was also able to discriminate between patients with different stages of disease (p < 0.002, Δscore > 7.4) and most results were comparable in patients with different time since diagnosis. Conclusion: K-BILD is a valid and reliable instrument in patients with IPF and in patients with different time since diagnosis. To a major extent, K-BILD scores reflected the impact of dyspnoea on HRQL and the impact of physical functional capacity measured by the 6MWT to a moderate degree. Compared to PFTs alone, K-BILD provides additional information on the burden of living with IPF, and importantly, K-BILD is simple to implement in both research and clinical contexts. Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.org (NCT02818712) on 30 June 2016.Keywords
Funding Information
- Region Midtjyllands Forskningsfond
- TrygFonden (118860)
- Boehringer Ingelheim
- Sundhedsvidenskabelige Fakultet, Aarhus Universitet
- Danmarks Lungeforening
- Ellen and Knud Dalhoff Larsens Fond
This publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- The minimal important difference of the King's Brief Interstitial Lung Disease Questionnaire (K-BILD) and forced vital capacity in interstitial lung diseaseRespiratory Medicine, 2013
- Evaluation of the chronic obstructive pulmonary disease assessment test for measurement of health‐related quality of life in patients with interstitial lung diseaseRespirology, 2012
- An Official ATS/ERS/JRS/ALAT Statement: Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: Evidence-based Guidelines for Diagnosis and ManagementAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 2011
- Development and validity testing of an IPF-specific version of the St George's Respiratory QuestionnaireThorax, 2010
- Development of the ATAQ-IPF: a tool to assess quality of life in IPFHealth and Quality of Life Outcomes, 2010
- Interstitial lung disease guidelineThorax, 2008
- Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnairesJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2007
- Health-related quality of life in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. What is the main contributing factor?Respiratory Medicine, 2005
- Principles of Good Practice for the Translation and Cultural Adaptation Process for Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO) Measures: Report of the ISPOR Task Force for Translation and Cultural AdaptationValue in Health, 2005
- The MOS 36-ltem Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36)Medical Care, 1992