A hop testing alternative for functional performance following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
Open Access
- 16 August 2024
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS ONE
- Vol. 19 (8) , e0309003
Abstract
The purpose of this work was to provide a simple method to determine reactive strength during the 6-meter timed hop test (6mTH) and evaluate its association with isokinetic peak torque in patients following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). Twenty-nine ACLR patients who were at least four months from surgery were included in this analysis. Participants were brought into the laboratory on one occasion to complete functional testing. Quadriceps and hamstring isokinetic testing was completed bilaterally at 60, 180, and 300 deg∙s-1, using extension peak torque from each speed as the outcome measure. The 6mTH was completed bilaterally using a marker-based motion capture system, and reactive strength ratio (RSR) was calculated from the vertical velocity of the pelvis during the test. An adjustment in RSR was made using the velocity of the 6mTH test to account for different strategies employed across participants. Repeated measures correlations were used to determine associations among isokinetic and hop testing variables. A two-way mixed analysis of variance was used to determine differences in isokinetic and hop testing variables between operated and non-operated legs and across male and female participants. Moderate positive associations were found between RSR (and adjusted RSR) and isokinetic peak torque at all speeds (r = .527 to .577). Mean comparisons showed significant main effects for leg and sex. Patients showed significant deficits in their operated versus non-operated legs in all isokinetic and hop testing variables, yet only isokinetic peak torque and timed hop time showed significant differences across male and female groups. Preliminary results are promising but further development is needed to validate other accessible technologies available to calculate reactive strength during functional testing after ACLR. Pending these developments, the effects of movement strategies, demographics, and levels of participation on RSR can then be explored to translate this simple method to clinical environments.Keywords
This publication has 51 references indexed in Scilit:
- A comparison of three-dimensional kinematics between markerless and marker-based motion capture in overground gaitJournal of Biomechanics, 2023
- There Is Substantial Variation in Rehabilitation Protocols Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Survey of 46 American Orthopaedic SurgeonsArthroscopy, 2022
- Contemporary Principles for Postoperative Rehabilitation and Return to Sport for Athletes Undergoing Anterior Cruciate Ligament ReconstructionArthroscopy, Sports Medicine, and Rehabilitation, 2022
- Rehabilitation and Return to Sport Testing After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Where Are We in 2022?Arthroscopy, Sports Medicine, and Rehabilitation, 2022
- Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rehabilitation and Return to Sport: How Fast Is Too Fast?Arthroscopy, Sports Medicine, and Rehabilitation, 2022
- Reactive Strength Index and its Associations with Measures of Physical and Sports Performance: A Systematic Review with Meta-AnalysisSports Medicine, 2021
- Demographic and surgical factors affect quadriceps strength after ACL reconstructionKnee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 2018
- A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability ResearchJournal of Chiropractic Medicine, 2016
- A kinematic method to detect foot contact during running for all foot strike patternsJournal of Biomechanics, 2015
- Symmetry restoration and functional recovery before and after anterior cruciate ligament reconstructionKnee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 2012