Protective Effects of BNT162b2 Vaccination on Aerobic Capacity Following Mild to Moderate SARS-CoV-2 Infection: A Cross-Sectional Study Israel
Authors:
- Yair BlumbergYair Blumberg
- Michael EdelsteinMichael Edelstein
- Kamal Abu JabalKamal Abu Jabal
- Ron GolanRon Golan
- Neta TuviaNeta Tuvia
- Yuval PeretsYuval Perets
- Musa SaadMusa Saad
- Tatyana LevinasTatyana Levinas
- Dabbah SaleemDabbah Saleem
- Zeev IsraeliZeev Israeli
- Abu Raya AlaaAbu Raya Alaa
- Gabby Elbaz GreenerGabby Elbaz Greener
Open Access
- 29 July 2022
- journal article
- research article
- Published by MDPI AG in Journal of Clinical Medicine
- Vol. 11 (15) , 4420
Abstract
Patients previously infected with acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) may experience post-acute adverse health outcomes, known as long COVID. The most reported symptoms are fatigue, headache and attention/concentration issues, dyspnea and myalgia. In addition, reduced aerobic capacity has been demonstrated in both mild and moderate COVID-19 patients. It is unknown whether COVID-19 vaccination mitigates against reduced aerobic capacity. Our aim was to compare the aerobic capacity of vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals previously infected with SARS-CoV-2. Methods: Individuals aged 18 to 65 years with laboratory-confirmed mild to moderate COVID-19 disease were invited to Ziv Medical Centre, Israel, three months after SARS-CoV-2 infection. We compared individuals unvaccinated at the time of infection to those vaccinated in terms of aerobic capacity, measured using symptom-limited cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET). Results: We recruited 28 unvaccinated and 22 vaccinated patients. There were no differences in baseline demographic and pulmonary function testing (PFT) parameters. Compared with unvaccinated individuals, those vaccinated had higher V’O2/kg at peak exercise and at the anaerobic threshold. The V’O2/kg peak in the unvaccinated group was 83% of predicted vs. 100% in the vaccinated (p < 0.002). At the anaerobic threshold (AT), vaccinated individuals had a higher V’O2/kg than those unvaccinated. Conclusions: Vaccinated individuals had significantly better exercise performance. Compared with vaccinated individuals, a higher proportion of those unvaccinated performed substantially worse than expected on CPET. These results suggest that vaccination at the time of infection is associated with better aerobic capacity following SARS-CoV-2 infection.Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Clinical characterization of dysautonomia in long COVID-19 patientsScientific Reports, 2021
- Impact of COVID-19 on exercise pathophysiology: a combined cardiopulmonary and echocardiographic exercise studyJournal of Applied Physiology, 2021
- Hyperventilation: A Possible Explanation for Long-Lasting Exercise Intolerance in Mild COVID-19 Survivors?Frontiers in Physiology, 2021
- Exercise efficiency impairment in metabolic myopathiesScientific Reports, 2020
- Standardization of Spirometry 2019 Update. An Official American Thoracic Society and European Respiratory Society Technical StatementAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 2019
- The Usefulness of the Anaerobic Threshold in the Assessment and Prognostic Evaluation of the Patient With DyspneaReviews in Cardiovascular Medicine, 2012
- The relationship between minute ventilation and oxygen consumption in heart failure: Comparing peak VE/VO2 and the oxygen uptake efficiency slopeInternational Journal of Cardiology, 2012
- Cardiopulmonary exercise testing and its applicationPostgraduate Medical Journal, 2007
- Oxygen uptake efficiency slope: A new index of cardiorespiratory functional reserve derived from the relation between oxygen uptake and minute ventilation during incremental exerciseJACC, 1996
- Predicted Values for Clinical Exercise TestingAmerican Review of Respiratory Disease, 1984