High rate of unprovoked recurrent venous thrombosis is associated with high thrombin‐generating potential in a prospective cohort study
- 1 October 2008
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis
- Vol. 6 (10) , 1720-1725
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Indefinite anticoagulation after a first episode of unprovoked venous thromboembolism: yesJournal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis, 2007
- Unprovoked deep vein thrombosis should be treated with long‐term anticoagulation – noJournal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis, 2007
- d-Dimer Testing to Determine the Duration of Anticoagulation TherapyNew England Journal of Medicine, 2006
- Long-Term Management of Patients After Venous ThromboembolismCirculation, 2004
- D-Dimer Levels and Risk of Recurrent Venous ThromboembolismJAMA, 2003
- Incidence of recurrent venous thromboembolism in relation to clinical and thrombophilic risk factors: prospective cohort studyThe Lancet, 2003
- Predictive Value of D-Dimer Test for Recurrent Venous Thromboembolism After Anticoagulation Withdrawal in Subjects With a Previous Idiopathic Event and in Carriers of Congenital ThrombophiliaCirculation, 2003
- A Comparison of Three Months of Anticoagulation with Extended Anticoagulation for a First Episode of Idiopathic Venous ThromboembolismNew England Journal of Medicine, 1999
- The Long-Term Clinical Course of Acute Deep Venous ThrombosisAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1996
- A Comparison of Six Weeks with Six Months of Oral Anticoagulant Therapy after a First Episode of Venous ThromboembolismNew England Journal of Medicine, 1995