The usefulness of preoperative CT in colon cancer staging: impact of radiologists’ experience
Authors:
- 6 February 2023
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Abdominal Radiology
- Vol. 48 (4) , 1215-1226
Abstract
Purpose To assess the agreement between radiologists in the detection of specific features related to T- and N-stage and evaluate accuracy in colon cancer staging. Methods Patients who underwent contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) before surgery were enrolled and evaluated by three radiologists with different experience. Pathological data were used as the reference standard. Tumor location, presence of tumor bulging, fat stranding, lateroconal fascia invasion, enlarged vessels, axial short diameter of the biggest node, shape, enhancement pattern, intranodal necrosis, and cluster were collected. Reliability analysis was performed with κ statistics and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Logistic regressions were used to determine independent predictors associated with staging. Results Seventy five patients were evaluated. The reliability analysis was moderate to substantial for tumor location (κ = 0.853), T staging (κ = 0.531), tumor bulging (κ = 0.478), fat stranding (κ = 0.490), lateroconal fascia invasion (κ = 0.436), enlarged vessels (κ = 0.401), the axial short diameter of the biggest node (ICC = 0.732), shape (κ = 0.484), enhancement pattern (κ = 0.431), intranodal necrosis (κ = 0.606), and cluster (κ = 0.358). For all readers, sensitivity was higher for T3 lesions (60–69%) and specificity was higher for T2 and T4 lesions (84.5–90.0% and 82.4–85.1%). The diagnostic accuracy was acceptable for all lesions and among all readers (50.7–92.1%). The lateroconal fascia invasion and enlarged vessels resulted as independent predictor factors (OR = 3.292 and OR = 2.651) for T staging, while nodes’ cluster and dimension as independent predictor factors of N staging [OR = 3.798 and OR = 1.083]. Conclusion Reader’s experience is one of the most important factors associated with the correct classification of colon cancer. Moreover, CECT can help depict radiological features independently associated with the T and N stages.Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability ResearchJournal of Chiropractic Medicine, 2016
- Accuracy of preoperative T and N staging in colon cancer – a national population‐based studyColorectal Disease, 2016
- The role of multidetector CT in local staging and evaluation of retroperitoneal surgical margin involvement in colon cancerDiagnostic and Interventional Radiology, 2015
- EURECCA consensus conference highlights about colon & rectal cancer multidisciplinary management: The radiology experts reviewEuropean Journal of Surgical Oncology, 2014
- Colorectal cancer: From prevention to personalized medicineWorld Journal of Gastroenterology, 2014
- Selection of colon cancer patients for neoadjuvant chemotherapy by preoperative CT scanScandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology, 2013
- Diagnostic precision of CT in local staging of colon cancers: a meta-analysisClinical Radiology, 2010
- Accuracy of multidetector computed tomography in identifying poor prognostic factors in colonic cancerBritish Journal of Surgery, 2010
- Accuracy of CT prediction of poor prognostic features in colonic cancerBritish Journal of Radiology, 2008
- Computed tomographic evaluation and staging of cecal carcinomaGastrointestinal Radiology, 1989