American and Chinese Similarities and Differences in Defining and Valuing Creative Products
- 1 December 2012
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wiley in The Journal of Creative Behavior
- Vol. 46 (4) , 285-306
Abstract
This review of the literature explores how Americans and Chinese view creativity and what they expect from creative products. American and Chinese explicit beliefs about creativity (i.e., expert opinions) share many similarities. Implicit beliefs, however, show more divergence: Americans tend to value novelty and more “groundbreaking” types of creativity, whereas Chinese tend to appreciate creativity within constraints, such as reworking a traditional concept. The context of how people respond to creativity obviously varies by culture, although there are also some communal and universal creative ideals.Keywords
This publication has 86 references indexed in Scilit:
- Measuring Creativity for Innovation ManagementJournal of technology management & innovation, 2011
- Mirrors in the Head: Cultural Variation in Objective Self-AwarenessPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2008
- Integrating art historical, psychological, and neuroscientific explanations of artists' advantages in drawing and perception.Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 2007
- The Impact of Culture and Individualism–Collectivism on the Creative Potential and Achievement of American and Chinese AdultsCreativity Research Journal, 2006
- A Cross-cultural Study of the Development of Artistic Talent, Creativity and GiftednessHigh Ability Studies, 2002
- Creativity across Time and Place: life span and cross‐cultural perspectivesHigh Ability Studies, 1998
- Cultural and economic antecedents to evolving consumer concerns in TaiwanJournal of Consumer Policy, 1993
- Social influences on creativity: Evaluation, coaction, and surveillanceCreativity Research Journal, 1990
- The development, reliability, and validity of the revised creative product semantic scaleCreativity Research Journal, 1989
- Possessions and the Extended SelfJournal of Consumer Research, 1988