Does a Point-of-Care 3-Dimensional Printer Result in a Decreased Length of Surgery for Orbital Fractures?

This publication has 52 references indexed in Scilit:

• Three-dimensional (3D) printing for post-traumatic orbital reconstruction, a systematic review and meta-analysis
  British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 2022
• Orbital reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the role of patient-specific implants
  Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 2022
• A retrospective study to compare the treatment outcomes with and without surgical navigation for fracture of the orbital wall
  Chinese Journal of Traumatology, 2021
• Intraoral Scanner, Three-Dimensional Imaging, and Three-Dimensional Printing in the Dental Office
  Dental Clinics of North America, 2020
• Use of 3D Printed Models to Create Molds for Shaping Implants for Surgical Repair of Orbital Fractures
  Academic Radiology, 2020
• Clinical effects of 3-D printing-assisted personalized reconstructive surgery for blowout orbital fractures
  Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, 2017
• Classical versus custom orbital wall reconstruction: Selected factors regarding surgery and hospitalization
  Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, 2017
• A prospective multicenter study to compare the precision of posttraumatic internal orbital reconstruction with standard preformed and individualized orbital implants
  Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, 2016
• Patient specific implants (PSI) in reconstruction of orbital floor and wall fractures
  Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, 2015
• Avoiding Complications in the Repair of Orbital Floor Fractures
  JAMA Facial Plastic Surgery, 2014