Outcomes Following Endoscopic versus Open Carpal Tunnel Release—A Matched Study
- 30 November 2022
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in World Neurosurgery
- Vol. 171, e162-e171
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Similar effectiveness of the open versus endoscopic technique for carpal tunnel syndrome: a prospective randomized trialEuropean Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, 2015
- Open versus Endoscopic Carpal Tunnel Release: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled TrialsClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 2015
- Effectiveness and safety of endoscopic versus open carpal tunnel decompressionArchives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2014
- Comparison of carpal tunnel release with three different techniquesClinical Neurology and Neurosurgery, 2012
- Rate of Infection After Carpal Tunnel Release Surgery and Effect of Antibiotic ProphylaxisThe Journal of Hand Surgery, 2010
- Outcomes of endoscopic surgery compared with open surgery for carpal tunnel syndrome among employed patients: randomised controlled trialBMJ, 2006
- Does Endoscopic Carpal Tunnel Release have a Higher Rate of Complications than Open Carpal Tunnel Release?Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume), 1999
- Endoscopic versus Open Carpal Tunnel Release: A Cost-Effectiveness AnalysisPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 1998
- Risk and Complications in Endoscopic Carpal Tunnel ReleaseJournal of Hand Surgery (European Volume), 1995
- Endoscopic release of the carpal ligament: A new technique for carpal tunnel syndromeArthroscopy, 1989