Impact of pharmacist-conducted home visits on the outcomes of lipid-lowering drug therapy
Authors:
- 1 February 2004
- journal article
- Published by Hindawi Limited in Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics
- Vol. 29 (1) , 23-30
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate a pharmacist‐conducted educational and monitoring programme, designed to promote dietary and lifestyle modification and compliance with lipid‐lowering drug therapy, for patients with dyslipidaemia. Methods: This was a prospective, randomized, controlled study. The participants were 94 adults, with 81 completing the study (intervention group: 39; control group: 42), with a cardiovascular‐related diagnosis and discharged from hospital, between April and October 2001, on lipid‐lowering drug therapy. Patients in the intervention group were visited at home monthly by a pharmacist, who educated the patients on the goals of lipid‐lowering treatment and the importance of lifestyle issues in dyslipidaemia and compliance with therapy, assessed patients for drug‐related problems, and measured total blood cholesterol levels using point‐of‐care testing. Patients in the control group received standard medical care. The main outcome measure was total blood cholesterol levels after 6 months, and an evaluation of patient and general practitioner satisfaction with the programme. Results: There was no significant difference in baseline total blood cholesterol levels between the two groups. The reduction over the course of the study in cholesterol levels within the intervention group was statistically significant (4·9 ±0·7 to 4·4 ± 0·6, P < 0·005), whereas there was no change within the control group (P = 0·26). At follow‐up, 44% of the intervention group patients and 24% of the control group patients had cholesterol levels below 4·0 mmol/L (P = 0·06). The reduction in total cholesterol in the intervention group should translate to an expected 21% reduction in cardiovascular mortality risk and a 16% reduction in total mortality risk – more than twice the risk reduction achieved in the control group. In addition, the programme was very well received by the patients and their general practitioners, by satisfaction questionnaire. Conclusion: A pharmacist‐conducted educational and monitoring intervention improved the outcomes of lipid‐lowering drug therapy.Keywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- MRC/BHF Heart Protection Study of cholesterol lowering with simvastatin in 20 536 high-risk individuals: a randomised placebocontrolled trialThe Lancet, 2002
- Coaching patients with coronary heart disease to achieve the target cholesterol:A method to bridge the gap between evidence-based medicine and the “real world”—randomized controlled trialJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2002
- Enhancing Drug Compliance in Lipid-Lowering TreatmentArchives of Family Medicine, 2000
- Lack of adherence to lipid‐lowering drug treatment. A comparison of utilization patterns in defined populations in Funen, Denmark and Bologna, ItalyBritish Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 2000
- The Lipid Treatment Assessment Project (L-TAP)Archives of internal medicine (1960), 2000
- Maximizing the Cost-effectiveness of Lipid-Lowering TherapyArchives of internal medicine (1960), 1998
- Cholesterol Reduction Yields Clinical BenefitCirculation, 1998
- Serum total cholesterol and long-term coronary heart disease mortality in different cultures. Twenty-five-year follow-up of the seven countries studyJAMA, 1995
- Discontinuation of Antihyperlipidemic Drugs — Do Rates Reported in Clinical Trials Reflect Rates in Primary Care Settings?New England Journal of Medicine, 1995
- Serum cholesterol, blood pressure, cigarette smoking, and death from coronary heart disease. Overall findings and differences by age for 316,099 white men. Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial Research GroupArchives of internal medicine (1960), 1992