Vowel Space Characteristics and Vowel Identification Accuracy
Author:
- 1 June 2008
- journal article
- Published by American Speech Language Hearing Association in Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research
- Vol. 51 (3) , 574-585
Abstract
Purpose: To examine the relation between vowel production characteristics and intelligibility. Method: Acoustic characteristics of 10 vowels produced by 45 men and 48 women from the J. M. Hillenbrand, L. A. Getty, M. J. Clark, and K. Wheeler (1995) study were examined and compared with identification accuracy. Global (mean f0, F1, and F2; duration; and amount of formant movement) and fine-grained measures (vowel space area; mean distance among vowels; f0, F1, and F2 ranges; duration ratio between long and short vowels; and formant movement ratio between dynamic and static vowels) were used to predict identification scores. Acoustic measures of the most frequently confused pairs (/æ/–/ε/ and /ɑ/–/ʌ/) were compared. Results: Global and fine-grained measures accounted for less than 1/4 of variance in identification scores: Vowel space area alone accounted for 9%–12% of variance. Differences in vowel identification were largely due to poor identification of /æ/, /ε/, /ɑ/, or /ʌ/. Well-identified vowels were distinctive in formant frequencies, duration, and amount of formant movement over time. Conclusions: Distinctiveness among neighboring vowels is more important in determining vowel intelligibility than vowel space area. Acoustic comparison of confused vowels may be more useful in studying intelligibility of normal and disordered speech than in measuring vowel space area.Keywords
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- Acoustic characteristics of the vowel systems of six regional varieties of American EnglishThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2005
- Acoustic-phonetic correlates of talker intelligibility for adults and childrenThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2004
- Vowel intelligibility in clear and conversational speech for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listenersThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2002
- Some effects of duration on vowel recognitionThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2000
- Identification of resynthesized /hVd/ utterances: Effects of formant contourThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1999
- Dialect variation and formant frequency: The American English vowels revisitedThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1997
- Intelligibility of normal speech I: Global and fine-grained acoustic-phonetic talker characteristicsSpeech Communication, 1996
- Acoustic characteristics of American English vowelsThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1995
- A comparative acoustic study of English and Spanish vowelsThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1995
- A note on the acoustic-phonetic characteristics of inadvertently clear speechSpeech Communication, 1994